Hemby v. State
Decision Date | 27 November 1934 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 66 |
Citation | 26 Ala.App. 273,160 So. 119 |
Parties | HEMBY v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1934
Appeal from Circuit Court, Geneva County; Emmet S. Thigpen, Judge.
Casper alias C.C. Hemby, was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.
Affirmed.
Certiorari denied by Supreme Court in Hemby v. State (4 Div 799) 160 So. 120.
E.C Boswell, of Geneva, for appellant.
Thos. E. Knight, Jr., of Montgomery, for the State.
The indictment in this case contained one count which charged this appellant with the offense of violating the prohibition law by having whisky in his possession. The evidence upon the trial was in conflict and therefore presented a jury question. The jury returned a verdict of "guilty as charged in the indictment" and assessed a fine of $50. The defendant having failed to pay the fine and costs, or to secure same, the court sentenced him to hard labor for the county designating the required time at hard labor to pay the fine and cost, and added four months' hard labor thereto. The judgment of conviction appears regular in all respects. This appeal is taken therefrom.
But one question is presented for our consideration and this relates to a certain ruling of the court upon the admission of the evidence.
The defendant elected to and testified in his own behalf, and denied that he had the whisky in his possession as had been testified to by state witness Hall. On his direct examination he also testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Shoemaker v. State
...trial court's ruling was here correct as showing the entire transaction, part of which was brought out by the appellant. Hemby v. State, 26 Ala.App. 273, 160 So. 119, cert. denied, 231 Ala. 7, 160 So. 120 (1934)." Id., at Here, as in Ford, the State presented the evidence in an attempt to s......
-
Ford v. State, 3 Div. 821
...trial court's ruling was here correct as showing the entire transaction, part of which was brought out by the appellant. Hemby v. State, 26 Ala.App. 273, 160 So. 119, cert. denied, 231 Ala. 7, 160 So. 120 The appellant secondly argues that his motion for new trial was improperly denied beca......
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Foster, 6 Div. 708
-
Hemby v. State, 4 Div. 799
...Petition of Casper Hemby for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Hemby v. State, 160 So. 119. denied. ANDERSON, C.J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur. ...