Hendershot v. Shields' Ex'r

Decision Date22 January 1886
Citation3 A. 355,42 N.J.E. 317
PartiesHENDERSHOT v. SHIELDS' EX'R.
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery

L. De Witt Taylor, for complainant.

W. H. Morrow, for defendant.

BIRD, V. C. The construction of the will of Thomas Shields is asked for by this bill. The doubt which induced the complainant to file her bill arises under the seventh and eleventh and twelfth sections of the will. So much of them as is essential I will transcribe:

"My executor is hereby directed to lease and rent out all my real estate while the same shall remain unsold, and receive the rents thereof until possession thereof is taken by a purchaser; the net amount of which rents, after deducting the charges for the repair and insurance of the property, shall he a part of the income and not of the principal of my estate." "As soon as my executor shall have completed, as near as he reasonably can, the payment of my debts, the specific legacies aforesaid, and the expenses of settling my estate up to that time, my executor shall add together the gross amount of my personal estate, all moneys which have accrued from the rents or sales of my real estate, and for rent or royalty for iron ore mined up to that time, and all moneys received from all other sources, from which sum he shall deduct the aforesaid payments and any known liabilities. The balance shall constitute the principal of my estate as first ascertained, and shall be invested and kept at interest on as good security as can reasonably be procured, and the interest or dividends thereon shall constitute the income of my estate. Said principal shall afterwards be increased by all moneys received for land sold afterwards, and by such rents or royalties for iron ore mined as is hereinbefore made or ordered to be principal; and said income shall afterwards be increased by the annual net rents which shall afterwards accrue on my real estate and be received, by the interest on the money received for land sold afterwards, and by the rents or royalties for iron ore sold, hereinbefore declared income."

"(12) Out of the income for each current year after the same shall begin to accrue as aforesaid, my executor shall first pay all taxes which shall be assessed on said principal, and the annual charges and commissions for investing said principal, and collecting and disbursing said income, and also the aforesaid annuity to my wife. The balance of such income shall be divided into ten equal parts, one of which I do hereby give; devise,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Martin v. Dial
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1933
    ...re Bates, 159 Mass. 252, 34 N. E. 266; Martley v. Martley, 77 Neb. 163, 108 N. W. 979; Sheafe v. Cushing, 17 N. H. 508; Hendershot v. Shields, 42 N. J. Eq. 317, 3 A. 355; Adams v. Massey, 184 N. Y. 62, 76 N. E. 916; Baird v. Baird, 42 N. C. 265; In re Phillips' Estate, 205 Pa. 504, 55 A. 21......
  • Scarbor. v. Scarbor.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • May 6, 1943
    ...clauses of his will to be given effect, these rules serve to confirm the interpretation. Page on Wills, Section 932; Hendershot v. Shields, Ch., 42 N.J.Eq. 317, 3 A. 355; Rogers' Ex'rs v. Rogers, Ch., 49 N.J.Eq. 98, 23 A. 125; Byrne v. Byrne, Ch., 123 N.J.Eq. 6, 195 A. 848. The gift of one-......
  • Guar. Trust Co. Of N.Y. v. N.Y. Cmty. Trust
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • December 13, 1946
    ...entitled and empowered to direct payment of all the net income from the trust fund forming the basis of this suit. See Hendershot v. Shields, 42 N.J.Eq. 317, 3 A. 355; Rogers' Ex'rs v. Rogers, 49 N.J.Eq. 98, 23 A. 125; Johnson v. Haldane, 95 N.J.Eq. 404, 124 A. 63; Byrne v. Byrne, 123 N.J.E......
  • Rausch v. Libby
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • December 9, 1942
    ...page 247, 28 A. 587, at page 589; Byrne v. Byrne, 123 N.J.Eq. 6, 195 A. 848; Cronan v. Coll, 69 N.J.Eq. 694, 60 A. 1092; Hendershot v. Shields, 42 N.J.Eq. 317, 3 A. 355. This rule of construction, however, must be applied in conjunction with the further rule that words of doubtful import ca......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT