Henderson v. Henderson
Citation | 97 So. 353,210 Ala. 73 |
Decision Date | 24 May 1923 |
Docket Number | 4 Div. 21. |
Parties | HENDERSON ET AL. v. HENDERSON ET AL. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied June 28, 1923.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Arthur B. Foster, Judge.
Bill by Sallie E. Henderson, Gussie Henderson Jones, Fred W Henderson, Fox Henderson, Jr., and Frank L. Jones against Jake Henderson, Mary Henderson, and Dorothy Henderson, a minor, for removal of the administration of the estate of Fox Henderson, deceased, from the probate court to the circuit court in equity and for the construction of the will of said Fox Henderson. From the decree, defendants Jake Henderson and Dorothy Henderson, by her guardian ad litem, appeal. Corrected and affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
It is shown by the bill that Fox Henderson died June 13, 1918 possessed of considerable property; that on January 1, 1917 he prepared and had executed what purported to be articles of partnership between himself, his wife, and his children; that he and his wife executed a deed conveying all his property to the partnership so created, and himself executed an instrument transferring a large number of shares of the capital stock of various corporations to the partnership. It is further shown that at his death Fox Henderson left a last will, dated October 23, 1912, which has been duly probated.
The articles of partnership exhibited are in substance as follows:
are fully paid, as outlined to some extent hereafter but not fully, as there may be many new things to arise at different times that may call for expense, which, if right and correct, should be paid by the firm of said Fox Henderson & Sons; those that I will specially mention as follows: Fox Henderson, Jr., is to be paid for his services for the running of the business, keeping the books, making settlement, and keeping the business moving in every way, loaning out the money (on good security) at 6 and 8 per cent. interest, or at whatever rate of interest him and myself shall decide is best, while I am alive, and after my death at a rate the majority may agree on, or either Fox Henderson, Jr., may decide. The said Fox Henderson, Jr., for all the above is to receive a salary of fifteen hundred ($1,500.00) dollars per annum for his services. As for me and my services, I make no charge whatever. I agree that all my time and judgment used in and for the good of the business shall be entirely free of charge. The main charge and item of expense that is made by me as against the business of Fox Henderson & Sons is the item of general expenditures, etc., charged by me on everything turned over to the business by me, which shall go to make up the capital stock of the said Fox Henderson & Sons, amounting to something in the neighborhood of say about, can't say as to amount, but will say it is, and shall be, about all the property I own of every kind whatever, the addition foots up when all amounts are transferred, all accounts made during the year (1917) nineteen hundred and seventeen, from January 1, 1917, or even November and December (taken for 1917), on up to the winding up of 1917. Thereafter as long as I live each account, note, or mortgage shall go into the business of Fox Henderson & Sons from the beginning of January 1, 1917, whether placed in the business at that date, or any other date before said year of 1917, or any other year thereafter; the only difference being that I am to get credit only for the year the said amount or amounts is put into the business, and on January 1st for the year in which it is placed in by me, let the amount be whatever it may, as it is my full intention to place the majority, if not entirely all, of what I own and possess, even now or at a future date, into the business of Fox Henderson & Sons, composed of Fox Henderson, Fox Henderson, Jr., Fred W. Henderson, Gussie Henderson Jones, and my wife, Sallie E. Henderson, and all of the above, or so many as may continue to live, Fox H., Fox H., Jr., Fred W. H., Gussie Henderson Jones, and Frank L. Jones, and Mrs. Fox Henderson as trustees for my unfortunate boy, Jake Henderson (without bond), his natural life, and at his death to go to the same trustees, or so many as may still live for the benefit of little Dorothy Henderson, his daughter and only child, and if any other children born of his (Jake's) then be treated to share equally with Dorothy by the same trustees. As to the amount to be paid to my unfortunate boy, Jake, and also to his child, Dorothy, or his children, if any others, by the trustees, I will mention later on after considering everything fully. In this agreement by me et al., and understanding as to the one-sixth (1/6) interest, I to-day give them from November or December's new business, 1916, which they will own in the firm at my death and any all of their share of profits and losses outside of my one-sixth individual interest, which is a one-sixth undivided interest. As to my individual interest of one-sixth in case of my death, I wish the entire amount which may stand to my credit on the books of Fox Henderson & Sons, a one-sixth interest in profits and losses from January, 1917, or on books of Fox Henderson, or that may be in my possession or due to me from any source whatsoever, to be disposed of as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Powell v. Pearson
...v. Crute, 208 Ala. 2, 93 So. 694; Caldwell v. Caldwell, 204 Ala. 161, 85 So. 493; Crawford v. Carlisle, 206 Ala. 379, 89 So. 565; Henderson v. Henderson, supra. statute, that all property not disposed of by will and testamentary instruments is required, and must be administered and distribu......
-
Byrd v. Wallis
... ... National ... Bank of Greece v. Savarika, 167 Miss. 571; Marx ... v. Hale, 131 Miss. 290, 95 So. 441; Morris v ... Henderson, 37 Miss. 507; Ryals v. MePhail, 154 ... Miss. 295, 122 So. 493; 28 R. C. L. 338 and 339, sec. 331; ... Torre v. Chestnut, 74 A.L.R. 540; ... ...
-
Tumlin v. Troy Bank & Trust Co., 4 Div. 538
...than mere cumulation. We have given consideration to this statute in some of our cases as pointed out on former appeal. Henderson v. Henderson, 210 Ala. 73, 97 So. 353; Ramage v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank, 249 Ala. 240, 30 So.2d 706; Goodwyn v. Cassels, 207 Ala. 482, 93 So. 405; W......
-
Reid v. Armistead
... ... 266 and ... page 273, 89 So. 479, for many authorities; Crawford et ... al. v. Carlisle, 206 Ala. 379, 385, 89 So. 565; ... Henderson et al. v. Henderson et al., 210 Ala. 73, ... 97 So. 353. To illustrate: In the second paragraph of the ... will the testator specifically provides ... ...