Henderson v. United States
| Decision Date | 17 May 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 24593.,24593. |
| Citation | 395 F.2d 209 |
| Parties | C. W. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
C. W. Henderson, pro se.
H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., for appellee.
Before GODBOLD and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and McRAE, District Judge.
This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Appellant was convicted for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 after entry of a plea of guilty on the advice of appointed counsel.
The sole contention on appeal is that Appellant was arrested, held, and interrogated without counsel for one week before being taken before a United States Commissioner. In its order, the district court indicated that prior to accepting the guilty plea it determined that the plea was freely, knowingly, and voluntarily given. This finding has not been attacked in this appeal. It is well settled that a plea of guilty entered voluntarily and with the consent of counsel constitutes a waiver as to all nonjurisdictional defects in the prior proceedings. Busby v. Holman, 356 F.2d 75 (5th Cir. 1966); Cooper v. Holman, 356 F.2d 82 (5th Cir. 1966); Phillips v. United States, 318 F.2d 17 (5th Cir. 1963).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Castle v. United States
...the statutory limits is not reviewable on appeal and does not ascend to the orbit of a constitutional violation." See Henderson v. Dutton, 5th Cir. 1968, 395 F.2d 209 June 24, 1968; Lacaze v. United States, 5th Cir. 1968, 391 F.2d 516. It might be argued that the excessive fining of an indi......
-
Clark v. State
...Cir. 1968); Askew v. Alabama, 398 F.2d 825 (5th Cir. 1968); Abram v. United States, 398 F.2d 350 (3rd Cir. 1968); Henderson v. United States, 395 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1968); Corn v. Oklahoma, 394 F.2d 478 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 917, 89 S.Ct. 245, 21 L.Ed.2d 203 (1968); Litto......
-
Kimbrough v. Beto
...5 Cir., 356 F.2d 75 (1966); Law v. Beto, 5 Cir., 370 F.2d 369 (1966); Brown v. Beto, 5 Cir., 377 F.2d 950 (1967); Henderson v. United States, 5 Cir., 395 F.2d 209 (1968). 3. The State was not limited to psychiatric testimony in rebutting psychiatric opinion evidence offered by the defense. ......
-
Peoples v. United States
...entered in this case, waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses and constitutes an admission of guilt. Henderson v. United States, 395 F.2d 209 (5th Cir. 1968); Davis v. United States, 392 F.2d 291 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 986, 89 S.Ct. 461, 21 L.Ed.2d 447 (1968); Hughes ......