Hendrix v. State

Docket NumberCR-19-347
Decision Date21 November 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Keesee v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 31, 2022
    ...likewise does not entertain nonjurisdictional arguments that a party did not raise before the circuit court. E.g. , Hendrix v. State , 2019 Ark. 351, at 6, 588 S.W.3d 17, 21. Yet it appears the majority opinion is making an exception when the State is a party. The State already enjoys certa......
  • Staggs v. State, CR-20-349
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • May 26, 2021
    ...448 S.W.3d 220. Further, a continuance should be granted only upon a showing of good cause. Ark. R. Crim. P. 27.3 (2020); Hendrix v. State, 2019 Ark. 351, 588 S.W.3d 17. A lack of diligence alone is a sufficient basis to deny a motion for continuance. Hendrix, 2019 Ark. 351, 588 S.W.3d 17 ;......
  • Beard v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 20, 2022
    ...within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of that discretion. Hendrix v. State , 2019 Ark. 351, at 3, 588 S.W.3d 17, 19. An appellant must not only demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion for a continua......
  • McCauley v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 27, 2023
    ...that the circuit court abused its discretion and show that the decision resulted in prejudice amounting to a denial of justice. Id., 588 S.W.3d at 19. is not presumed in this context. Id., 588 S.W.3d at 19. A continuance should be granted only upon a showing of good cause. Ark. R. Crim. P. ......
  • Get Started for Free