Hennessy v. Griggs
Decision Date | 01 April 1890 |
Parties | Hennessy v. Griggs et al. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Three parties-G., E., and H.-formed a copartnership under the name of “The Dakota Gas & Fuel Company.” The copartnership articles provided that the partnership capital should be $50,000,-G. to furnish $5,000, E. to furnish $10,000, and H. $10,000,-the remaining $25,000 to be held by G., to be by him negotiated, and raised from outside parties; and, further, that all profits should be divided between the parties in proportion to the capital furnished and held by each, and on the basis of a capital of $50,000, and that, as soon as might be, said parties should incorporate under the same name, for the same purposes, and all the partnership effects should be assigned to the corporation, and that the capital stock should be not less than $50,000, and should be held and divided among said parties in the same proportion as the capital of said copartnership. Held, (1) that the articles contemplated that the capital to be furnished as specified should be actual capital, and that parol evidence to show that said capital was to be nominal only was properly disregarded; (2) that plaintiff, H., having joined with G. and E. and two other parties in executing and filing articles of incorporation, whereby they became a body corporate under the name and for the purposes provided in the copartnership articles, as between said parties, and under the copartnership articles, the existence of the corporation worked eo instanti the dissolution of the partnership, and that, although the articles of incorporation provided for five incorporators, instead of three, and fixed the capital stock at $100,000, yet, as H. was one of the incorporators, he is conclusively held to have assented thereto, and cannot be heard to say that the corporation so formed is not the corporation provided for by the copartnership articles, particularly when such changes could in no manner affect his interest in or control over such corporation; (3) that, while H. was a necessary party to a transfer of the firm property to the corporation, yet a transfer thereof by G. and E. cannot, in equity, be avoided by H. because he wrongfully refused to join therein; (4) that, as all the capital stock of the corporation would belong to the same parties who furnished the firm capital, and in the same proportion, it was competent for said corporation to assess its capital stock for an amount sufficient to pay the debts incurred by the firm in procuring the property that was transferredto the corporation, so long as such assessment was less than the amount that each party was originally required to furnish under the copartnership articles, none of said parties having actually paid in their firm capital, and said parties would not be entitled to said stock without paying such assessment; and plaintiff, H., would not be entitled to paid-up non-assessable stock unless he had paid in the full amount as required by the copartnership articles.
Appeal from district court, Grand Forks county; C. F. Templeton, Judge.
Action in equity by Thomas Hennessy against Alexander Griggs, Jacob S. Eshelman, and the Dakota Gas & Fuel Company. The decree dismissed plaintiff's complaint, and he appeals.
J. H. Bosard, R. E. Noyes, W. P. Landon, and P. J. McLaughlin, for appellant. Cy. Wellington, for respondent.
On November 26, 1886, and as a result of certain parol negotiations theretofore had, the plaintiff, Hennessy, and the defendants Griggs and Eshelman, entered into a written agreement of copartnership, as follows:
Under this agreement, the copartnership proceeded to obtain from the city of Grand Forks the necessary franchise for the construction and maintenance of a gas plant, and also a contract for lighting said city for a term of years, and contracts with various private parties; and in the summer of 1887 they began the work of erecting suitable buildings and tanks upon certain land, the title to which was in the defendant Griggs, and of laying gas-mains, erecting posts, and doing generally whatever was necessary to constitute a gas plant; the plaintiff, Hennessy, who was a skilled plumber and gas-fitter, acting as superintendent of said works. On October 17, 1887, said hennessy, Griggs, and Eshelman, with William Budge and W. J. Murphy, executed and acknowledged certain articles of incorporation, which were duly filed, and the said parties became a body corporate as the Dakota Gas & Fuel Company; said corporation being formed to carry on the business begun by said copartnership, and succeeding to all the rights thereof. The capital stock of the company was $100,000, divided into shares of $100 each. After the formation of the corporation, Griggs, without the knowledge and consent of plaintiff, conveyed to said corporation the land on which the gas-works had been erected, and which was valued at $3,000; and on November 15, 1887, Griggs and Eshelman, without the consent of plaintiff, pretended to convey to said company all the property and effects of the copartnership by assignment in writing, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Territory v. O'Hare
- Territory v. O'Hare
-
Donovan v. Johnson
... ... 47 C.J ... Such ... transfer vests ownership of the firm property in the ... purchaser. 47 C.J. 797; Hennessey v. Griggs, 1 N.D ... If a ... written instrument fails to express the entire agreement or ... understanding of the parties, the parole ... ...
-
Cunningham v. Spencer
...the partnership debt, and it will be prima facie liable therefor." See Reed v. First Nat. Bank, 46 Neb. 168, 64 N.W. 701; Hennessy v. Griggs, 1 N. D. 52, 44 N.W. 1010; Curtis, Jones & Co. v. Smelter Nat. Bank, 43 391, 96 P. 172; and Byrne & Hammer v. Willis-Dunn Co., 23 S.D. 221, 121 N.W. 6......