Henriques v. Vaccaro
Decision Date | 05 November 1951 |
Docket Number | No. 40098,40098 |
Citation | 220 La. 216,56 So.2d 236 |
Parties | HENRIQUES v. VACCARO. |
Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Fred S. Weis, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.
Dart, Guidry & Price and Edward F. Wegmann, all of New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.
Plaintiff, an attorney-at-law, is appealing from an adverse judgment in the district court, holding that he was estopped from prosecuting his claim for the balance allegedly due under a contingent fee contract with Lucas J. Vaccaro, by virtue of having previously had certified a check tendered by Vaccaro in full settlement of said fee.
The record discloses the following facts:
On October 8, 1946, Henriques agreed to represent Lucas J. Vaccaro in the latter's controversy with other stockholders of Tropical Ice Company, Inc., in which defendant was attempting (1) to prevent an amendment of the corporate charter which would have thereby conferred upon it the powers of a holding corporation with the right to deal in investments or speculations and (2) to force the corporation into liquidation with the ultimate purpose of effecting purchase of his stockholding at its 'fair and equitable value'. The fee contract consists of a letter of employment, addressed by defendant Vaccaro jointly to appellant and John J. Finnorn, another attorney. (Mr. Finnorn is not a party to these proceedings.) The following provisions of the fee contract are pertinent:
'If you will accept this employment, I agree to pay you fees graduated as follows:
'All necessary costs, including court costs, and other expenses authorized by me to be in addition to the graduated fees mentioned above.
'I couple your employment in this matter with an interest in the stock, and agree not to make any settlement of this matter in whole or in part, or to sell this stock or any part thereof without your knowledge and full co-operation and consent.'
As a result of mutual efforts on the part of attorneys and client, defendant was successful in achieving both of the objectives stated supra. The liquidation of the corporation was effected; and on January 7, 1947, Vaccaro received his share of the distribution in kind made of its assets--$29,829.95 cash and 703 shares of the capital stock of Banco Atlantido of LaCeiba, Honduras (there was reserved for continencies $3,815.45.)
On January 8, 1947, Vaccaro wrote Henriques, enclosing check in the amount of $1,309.42, representing the latter's 45% share of the fee (Finnorn's share was 55%); in said letter the fee calculation was explained thus:
'* * * I have this date received settlement from the Tropical Ice Company and am outlining below for your information the basis of settlement from the Tropical Ice Company and likewise the basis of our agreement.
'278 1/2 shares of Tropical Ice Co. stock basic value $250.00 per share--$69,625.00.
This letter did not reach Henriques until nearly a week later, and he promptly rejected both the computation of the fee and the offer of the check in full settlement thereof:
'* * *
'The 703 shares of the stock of the Banco Atlantido which you received as partial settlement of your interest, are worth considerably more than the $98.00 per share; in fact your own Accountant placed a value largely in excess thereof, not including real estate, or banking facilities shown on the Bank's statement at only $2.00.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Audubon Ins. Co. v. Farr
... ... There was a disputed claim, a tender of a certain amount in settlement of that claim and an acceptance. Henriques v. Vaccaro, 220 La. 216, 56 So.2d 236 (1951). LSA-C.C. art. 3071, in pertinent part, defines a compromise as an agreement for preventing a lawsuit ... ...
-
Succession of Nelson
...document is not necessary for a proper solution of this case. Dura lex, sed lex. The law is hard, but such is the law. Henriques v. Vaccaro, 220 La. 216, 56 So.2d 236. The dation en paiement is dated August 8, 1931. It recites that Robert Wiegand is a holder of a promissory note in the amou......
-
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Landry
...draft. There was a disputed claim, a tender of a certain amount in settlement of that claim and an acceptance. Henriques v. Vaccaro, 220 La. 216, 56 So.2d 236 (1951). LSA-C.C. art. 3071, in pertinent part, defines a compromise as an agreement for preventing a lawsuit by which parties adjust......
-
Jones v. Standard Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 225
...held that this was an accord and satisfaction. See Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Farnsworth & Co., La.App., 171 So. 622. In Henriques v. Vaccaro, 220 La. 216, 56 So.2d 236, 238, enclosed with the check sent as payment was a statement that 'I am enclosing in full settlement of the contract my che......