Henry Huff, John Bullen, and Samuel Hale, Plaintiffs In Error v. Champion Hutchinson, Who Sues For the Use of William Hurlbut, Joseph Sweetzer, Philip Van Valkenburgh, and George Phillips

Decision Date01 December 1852
Citation55 U.S. 586,14 How. 586,14 L.Ed. 553
PartiesHENRY D. HUFF, JOHN BULLEN, AND SAMUEL HALE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CHAMPION J. HUTCHINSON, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF WILLIAM W. HURLBUT, JOSEPH A. SWEETZER, PHILIP VAN VALKENBURGH, AND GEORGE S. PHILLIPS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Tyler v. People
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 14 October 1859
    ... 7 Mich. 161 The People v. William Tyler Supreme Court of Michigan October 14, 1859 ... Henry Jones in the peace of God then and there being, ... Law ... Reg., 280; Brig James Gray v. John Fraser , 21 How ... It is ... also ... Lessee v. Astor , 2 How. 319; Huff v ... Hutchinson , 14 How. 586; Voorhies v. T ... judgment would not be reversible on error: Curt. Dig., 302, ... cases cited; Conkl Treat., ... Woodb. & M., 420; Lord Hale (cited 6 How. 397), 1 Bishop ... Cr. L., § 609 ... ...
  • New York Evening Post Co. v. Chaloner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 18 February 1920
    ...was a mere nominal party, a mere instrument through whom the legal right of the real plaintiff could be asserted. In 1852 Huff v. Hutchinson, 14 How. 586, 14 L.Ed. 553, United States marshal, even after he had gone out of office, was held competent to sue, in a United States court, on an at......
  • Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co., 259.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 12 February 1931
    ...concerned, as though Markley was alone named as plaintiff; and the action was properly removed to that court." See, also, Huff v. Hutchinson, 14 How. 586, 14 L. Ed. 553; Ferguson v. Ross (C. C.) 38 F. 161, 3 L. R. A. 322, and cases cited therein; Browne v. Strode, supra; McNutt v. Bland, su......
  • McLean v. State
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • 11 October 1873
    ...discharged by payment of the sums really due and costs. But this long ago was held matter of form, and not a reversible error. Huff v. Hutchinson, 14 How. 586. 14. perceive no error whatever in the trial and judgments. If any should be found to exist, this court now, here, has the proper ma......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT