Henry P. Moses Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
| Decision Date | 12 October 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 16787,16787 |
| Citation | Henry P. Moses Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 224 S.C. 193, 78 S.E.2d 187 (S.C. 1953) |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | HENRY P. MOSES CO. v. SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION. |
T. C. Callison, Atty. Gen., Claude K. Wingate, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbia, for appellant.
Marion Moise, Sumter, for respondent.
This appeal arises out of an action brought in the Court of Common Pleas for Sumter County to recover from appellant the sum of $1,110.48 which has been paid under protest.
The matter was referred to a special referee who recommended that the tax with interest collected by appellant be refunded. Exceptions were duly taken but were overruled by the Court of Common Pleas and the recommendation of the Master was adopted as the judgment of the Court in an Order dated February 9, 1953.
The Henry P. Moses Company, respondent here, was incorporated in the year 1918 by Herbert A. Moses and Henry P. Moses, brothers, of Sumter, South Carolina, for the general purpose of carrying on a real estate and insurance business, these two brothers being the only officers and stockholders of the corporation.
In the year 1941, the same brothers organized the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., with a capital stock of ten shares, eight of which were issued to the respondent, Henry P. Moses Company and one each to Henry P. Moses and Herbert A. Moses. The officers and stockholders of the two companies were identical.
During the year 1945, Henry P. Moses died and Mr. Herbert A. Moses became president of both Henry P. Moses Company and H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc. At this time Mr. Robert A. Moses, one of the sons of Henry P. Moses, was in the service and was discharged from the service in the fall of 1945. The stock of Mr. Henry P. Moses in both the Henry P. Moses Company and the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., was owned by his estate, of which Mr. Herbert A. Moses was one of the trustees and Mr. Moses' widow the other. After their discharge from the service, two of Mr. Henry P. Moses' sons, Mr. Robert A. Moses and Mr. Richard Moses, became connected with the two businesses. Mr. Robert A. Moses subsequently acquired stock in the two corporations and the officers of the two corporations then consisted of Herbert A. Moses, President and Treasurer, Robert A. Moses, Vice President, and Miss Mamie Edmunds, an employee, Secretary. The officers and stockholders of the two corporations were identical and both businesses were operated from the same office at 122 South Main Street, Sumter, South Carolina.
In 1949, the Henry P. Moses Company acquired the two outstanding shares of the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., and all assets of the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., were transferred to the Henry P. Moses Company and the stock of the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., was cancelled and the corporation dissolved. In entering this item in the Henry P. Moses Company's tax return, the sum of $23,958.99 appears as 'Liquidating Dividend' and it is the tax assessed upon this item around which the controversy revolves, it being the position of respondent that such transaction was a reorganization, merger or consolidation and therefore not subject to tax while appellant takes the position that the H. P. Moses Housing Company, Inc., was liquidated and that this item represents profits accruing therefrom to the parent company, the Henry P. Moses Company, and therefore subject to tax.
The Sections of the 1952 Code of Laws for South Carolina involved appear as follows:
Section 65-275. 'In a reorganization, consolidation or merger the exchange of stock or property for stock of a corporation a party to the organization, consolidation or merger shall not be deemed to result in gain or loss.'
Section 65-276. 'When in connection with the organization, merger or consolidation of a corporation stockholder receives, in place of stock or securities owned by him, new stock or securities, the basis for computing the gain or loss, if any, shall be, in case the stock or securities owned were acquired before January 1, 1921, the fair market price or value thereof as of that date and in all other cases the cost thereof.'
Section 65-277. 'The final distribution to the taxpayer of the assets of a corporation shall be treated as a sale of the stock or securities of the corporation owned by him and the gain or loss shall be computed accordingly.'
The many fine distinctions appearing in the cases from other jurisdictions on...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Stephenson Finance Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission
...Cyanide Co., D.C.Del., 24 F.2d 718.' See also 19 C.J.S. Corporations § 1604, page 1366, footnote 12; cf. Henry P. Moses Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 224 S.C. 193, 78 S.E.2d 187, and Carolina, C. & O. Ry. of South Carolina v. South Carolina Tax Commission, 197 S.C. 529, 15 S.E.2d Co......
-
Hurst v. Donegal & Conoy Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
... ... FIRE INS. CO ... No. 16785 ... Supreme Court of South Carolina ... Oct. 12, 1953 ... James A ... ...