Henry v. Carleton

Decision Date14 January 1897
Citation21 So. 225,113 Ala. 636
PartiesHENRY ET AL. v. CARLETON.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from city court of Gadsden; John H. Disque, Judge.

Action by S. J. Carleton against James F. Henry and another to recover for trespass on plaintiff's land and person. Demurrers to the complaint were overruled, and from a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed.

Brickell C.J., dissenting.

The complaint was as follows: "(1) The plaintiff claims of the defendants the sum of ten thousand dollars damages for an assault and battery committed by the defendants on the plaintiff, viz. on or about the 15th day of September, 1896. (2) The plaintiff claims of the defendants the further sum of ten thousand dollars damages for maliciously assaulting and beating the plaintiff on or about the 15th day of September 1896. (3) The plaintiff claims of the defendants the further sum of ten thousand dollars, for that heretofore, to wit, on or about the 15th day of September, 1896, the defendants came to plaintiff's place of business, and maliciously assaulted the plaintiff, by knocking him down and otherwise maltreating the plaintiff. (4) The plaintiff claims of the defendants the further sum of ten thousand dollars damages for that heretofore, to wit, on or about the 15th day of September, 1896, the defendants came to plaintiff's place of business, and, while the defendant Rogers held a pistol to intimidate plaintiff, the defendant Henry did assault, beat and otherwise maltreat plaintiff, to his great bodily and mental suffering, to his great damage, etc. (5) And plaintiff claims the further sum of ten thousand dollars damages for a trespass by the defendants on the following tract of land viz. a house and lot in Gadsden, known and designated as the 'Ice Plant,' belonging to and in the possession of plaintiff, and for assaulting and beating the plaintiff on or about the 15th day of September, 1896. (6) And plaintiff claims of the defendants the further sum of ten thousand dollars damages for a trespass of the defendants on the following tract of land, viz. a house and lot in Gadsden, known and designated as the 'Ice Plant,' belonging to and in the possession of plaintiff, and for maliciously assaulting, beating, and otherwise maltreating the plaintiff on or about the 15th day of September, 1896. (7) And the plaintiff claims of the defendants the further sum of ten thousand dollars damages, for that heretofore, to wit, on or about the 15th day of September, 1896, while plaintiff was on his own premises, the defendants entered, and, by presenting a pistol, put the plaintiff in fear, so that he could and dare not defend himself, and then assaulting and beating the plaintiff, by knocking him down, and slapping him in the face, and otherwise maltreating and insulting plaintiff, to his great and bodily suffering, to his damage above set forth."

To this complaint the defendants demurred as follows: "(1) Defendants demur to the whole complaint on the ground that it is an attempt to bring an action for an assault and battery against the two defendants jointly. (2) Because the damages for an assault and battery will not lie against two persons jointly. (3) Because the complaint contains no such averments as show a conspiracy between the defendants Henry and Rogers or otherwise authorize a joint suit against both." To the fifth and sixth counts of the complaint the defendants...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Stowers Furniture Co. v. Brake
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 17, 1908
    ...they are sufficiently shown to be parts of the same transaction, and the demurrer in this respect was properly overruled. Henry v. Carleton, 113 Ala. 636, 21 So. 225; Birmingham, etc., Co. v. Lintner, 141 Ala. 420, So. 363, 109 Am. St. Rep. 40; Southern Suspender Co. v. Van Borries, 91 Ala.......
  • Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Smith
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1910
    ... ... trespass was the result of an independent tort, they could ... not be joined in the same count. Henry v. Carlton, ... 113 Ala. 639, 21 So. 225; Cofer's Case, 110 Ala. 493, 18 ... So. 110. Alternative averments of matters of substance are ... ...
  • Hardeman v. Williams
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1910
    ... ... house the following personal property: One iron ... bedstead," etc. On the authority of Henry v ... Carlton, 113 Ala. 636, 21 So. 225, it is argued that ... there is a joinder in this count of trespass to realty with ... trespass to ... ...
  • Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co. v. Kimball
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 19, 1923
    ... ... opened the door and left it open. These counts are unlike the ... one condemned in the case of Henry v. Carlton, 113 ... Ala. 639, 21 So. 225 ... The ... evidence of John Island as to the condition in which he found ... the door and ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT