Henry v. Mann, 50343

Decision Date08 April 1975
Docket NumberNo. 1,No. 50343,50343,1
Citation215 S.E.2d 286,134 Ga.App. 522
PartiesJames T. HENRY v. O. M. MANN et al
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Fred W. Minter, Decatur, for appellant.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

WEBB, Judge.

An action to recover $1488 on open account was filed on February 24, 1974 in the State Court of DeKalb County by James T. Henry against Robert M. Mann and L. H. Hawkins, residents of DeKalb County, and O. M. Mann, a resident of Rockdale County, for survey work performed for them on property owned by them in DeKalb and Rockdale counties. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the resident defendants, and a verdict against only the nonresident defendant, O. M. Mann, for $1200 principal, plus interest and costs. Judgment thereon was entered, then an order arresting judgment against the nonresident O. M. Mann was entered by the court.

Subsequent to the foregoing Henry again instituted the same action against the three alleged debtors, this time in the Superior Court of Rockdale County. All three of the defendants asserted the defense of res judicata based on the results in the State Court of DeKalb County between the parties; the two resident defendants of DeKalb County pleaded to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court of Rockdale County and denied any indebtedness to Henry; and O. M. Mann denied that he was indebted to Henry 'in the amount sued for.' Robert M. Mann and L. H. Hawkins cross-claimed for $500 attorney fees. The trial judge sustained the plea of res judicata as to all defendants on November 7, 1974, and from this judgment the plaintiff appeals. Held:

Since neither of the residents of DeKalb County nor the petitioner excepted to the verdict and judgment in DeKalb State Court, the verdict and judgment conclusively eliminated those two DeKalb County residents and were final as to them. Ryner v. Duke, 206 Ga. 408, 409, 57 S.E.2d 171 (same case, 205 Ga. 280, 53 S.E.2d 362). There having been no recovery against the two resident defendants in the State Court of DeKalb County, that court could grant no relief against the nonresident Rockdale County defendant (Fowler v. Southern Airlines, 192 Ga. 845(8), 851, 16 S.E.2d 897, and citations), the verdict and judgment were not final as to him, and the plea of res judicata as to him falls. The arrest of judgment, the court having lost jurisdiction of him, was equivalent to his dismissal as a party defendant because of lack of jurisdiction, and the plaintiff was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Midway Youth Football Ladies Aux. v. Strickland
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • April 18, 1978
    ...resulted in a final judgment upon the merits. Acree v. Air Line Pilots Association, 390 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1968); Henry v. Mann, 134 Ga.App. 522, 215 S.E.2d 286 (1975); 18 Encyclopedia of Georgia Law, Judgments and Decrees — Res Judicata, § 283 (1970). In applying this test, the court deter......
  • Brooks v. Douglas
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 19, 1980
    ...& Assoc., 137 Ga.App. 165, 166, 223 S.E.2d 217 (1976); Thornhill v. Bullock, 118 Ga.App. 186, 162 S.E.2d 886 (1968); Henry v. Mann, 134 Ga.App. 522, 215 S.E.2d 286 (1975). In such a case, the suit in DeKalb County cannot be regarded as void ab initio. The filing of the suit tolled the statu......
  • Jolly v. Jolly
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 16, 1976
    ...jurisdiction. See Turner v. Shackleford, 39 Ga.App. 49(1), 145 S.E. 913; Evans v. Garrett, 72 Ga.App. 846, 35 S.E.2d 387; Henry v. Mann, 134 Ga.App. 522, 215 S.E.2d 286. We deal here however with an action in trover, the gravamen of which is the return of property. And we see no reason why ......
  • Phillips v. Williams
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 1976
    ...561; Fowler v. Southern Airlines, Inc., 192 Ga. 845(5), 16 S.E.2d 897; Warren v. Rushing, 144 Ga. 612(1), 87 S.E. 775; Henry v. Mann, 134 Ga.App. 522, 215 S.E.2d 286. And the defect is nonamendable. See, Holloway v. Frey, 130 Ga.App. 224(2), 202 S.E.2d 845. The same jurisdictional defect ap......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT