Henry v. Martin

Decision Date02 October 1894
CitationHenry v. Martin, 88 Wis. 367, 60 N. W. 263 (Wis. 1894)
PartiesHENRY v. MARTIN.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Chippewa county; R. D. Marshall, Judge.

Action by Robert Henry against Levi F. Martin. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The plaintiff sent money, to be loaned for him, to one Vesper Morgan. Morgan deposited the money in Seymour's Bank, in the name of J. D. Morgan, with notice that it was the money of third parties. He claims that at the time when the money was deposited the bank was insolvent, and that Seymour and his clerks knew that it was insolvent. Seymour failed, and assigned to the defendant for the benefit of his creditors. A small sum of money came to the hands of the assignee. The plaintiff claims to recover from the assignee his entire deposit on the ground that it was a trust fund, which remains in the hands of the assignee. There was a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained. The appeal is from that judgment.Vesper Morgan, for appellant.

F. J. Connor and T. F. Frawley, for respondent.

NEWMAN, J. (after stating the facts).

This case is ruled by Silk Co. v. Flanders, 87 Wis. 237, 58 N. W. 383. The plaintiff made no special deposit of his money in Seymour's Bank. It was not expected that the identical money deposited would be kept and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • The Evangelical Synod of North America v. Schoeneich
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 20, 1898
    ... ... Hackmann on the eighteenth day of September, 1893. On the ... twenty-seventh of September, 1893, the defendant, Henry J ... Schoeneich, took out letters of administration on the ... partnership estate, and two days thereafter took out letters ... of ... 622; Peoples' Bank's Appeal, 93 Pa. 107; ... Silk Co. v. Flanders, 87 Wis. 237; In re ... Bank, 87 Wis. 378, 58 N.W. 784; Henry v ... Martin, 88 Wis. 367, 60 N.W. 263; Thueminle v ... Barth, 89 Wis. 381 ...          In the ... case at bar there is no such thing as tracing the ... ...
  • First Nat. Bank v. C. Bunting & Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • January 27, 1900
    ...3 Ohio St. 309; Bank of Marysville v. Windischmuhlhauser etc. Co., 50 Ohio St. 151, 40 Am. St. Rep. 660, 33 N.E. 1054; Henry v. Martin, 88 Wis. 367, 60 N.W. 263; McLain v. Wallace, 103 Ind. 562, 5 N.E. Alston v. State, 92 Ala. 124, 9 South, 732; State v. Keim, 8 Neb. 63; State v. Bartley, 3......
  • State v. Thum
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1898
    ...P. 1100; State v. Buttles, 3 Ohio St. 309; Bank v. Windisch etc. Co., 50 Ohio St. 151, 40 Am. St. Rep. 660, 33 N.E. 1054; Henry v. Martin, 88 Wis. 367, 60 N.W. 263; McLain v. Wallace, 103 Ind. 562, 5 N.E. 911; Alston v. State, 92 Ala. 124, 9 So. 732; State of New York v. Mechanics' etc. Ins......
  • Bank Com'rs v. Sec. Trust Co.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • March 15, 1901
    ...the question is considered at considerable length, and with much ability. Silk Co. v. Flanders, 87 Wis. 237, 58 N. W. 383; Henry v. Martin, 88 Wis. 367, 60 N. W. 263; Burnham v. Barth, 89 Wis. 362, 62 N. W. 96; Dowie v. Humphrey, 91 Wis. 98, 64 N. W. 315; Bromley v. Railroad Co., 103 Wis. 5......
  • Get Started for Free