Henry v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 23 February 1891 |
Parties | HENRY et al. v. TRAVELERS' INS. CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Colorado |
The object of the original bill was to establish a contract, and for an accounting between the plaintiffs and the defendant on the basis of the alleged contract. The bill alleged, among other things, that the defendant held various notes mortgages, bonds, and stock as collateral security for money borrowed by the plaintiffs from the defendant, and that the defendant had given the plaintiffs notice (a copy of which was sent out in the bill) that it would, on the 28th day of September, 1885, sell certain named stocks to pay certain specified debts, for the payment of which the stocks had been pledged; and, in addition to the prayer for a full accounting, the bill prayed for an injunction to restrain the sale of the stocks mentioned in the notice, and 'that, if the defendant in the mean time, and before the final hearing of this cause, makes any sale or sales of any of the property pledged as security for said debts, or any thereof, that all of said sales be declared null and void, and for naught held ' The bill was filed in Denver, Colo., the day the sale was made in Hartford, Conn., and no injunction was moved for or issued. The court found and decreed that the defendant had entered into a contract with the plaintiffs in substance and effect as alleged in the bill, and it was referred to a master, to take and state the accounts between the parties. 33 F. 132. Months were consumed in taking testimony as to the state of the accounts. The master made a voluminous report covering all the dealings between the parties, and settling and adjusting the various accounts. If the plaintiffs filed any exceptions to the master's report, they were not insisted on at the hearing. The defendant filed numerous exceptions, some of which were sustained, and the accounts in some respects restated by the court, and a final decree rendered on the 15th of May, 1890. 42 F. 363. The plaintiffs had notice of the sale of the pledged stocks at the time the sale was made, and the testimony in the original cause disclosed the fact of sale, and everything connected therewith. The supplemental bill, among other things alleges:
'That in the month of September, 1885, the defendant gave your orators notice that the defendant would sell at public auction at Hartford, Conn., a great part of the stocks pledged as collateral security to pay certain debts, and which have been above described, to-wit:
Date of Note. Maker. Amount
Mar. 25, 1884, Signed, T. C. Henry, ................ $25,000
Mar. 10, 1884, " T. C. Henry, ................. 30,000
May 22, 1884, " T. C. Henry, ................. 50,000
Oct. 7, 1884, " T. C. Henry, .................. 1,500
Dec. 8, 1884, " T. C. Henry, .................. 3,000
May 18, 1884, " Colorado Loan & Trust Co., .... 5,000
May 27, 1884, " Uncompahgre C'l Co., ......... 50,000
June 23, 1884, " Colo. Loan & Trust Co., ...... 25,000
June 24, 1884, " Colo. Loan & Trust Co., ....... 5,000
July 1, 1884, " Colo. Loan & Trust Co., ....... 4,000
July 1, 1884, " Colo. Loan & Trust Co., ....... 5,000
July 1, 1884, " Colo. Loan & Trust Co., ....... 6,000
-- With interest on each of said notes. Unless the above said notes are paid within the time above mentioned, the Travelers' Insurance Company hereby gives you notice also that it will sell, on Monday, September 28, 1885, at 2 o'clock p.m., at the office of said company, in Hartford, Conn., at public auction, the following securities deposited with this company as collateral security for the payment of said notes, according to the terms of the respective pledges, to-wit: 11,845 shares Grand River Ditch Co.'s stock;--shares Fort Morgan Irrigation Co.'s stock; 3,401 shares Empire Land and Canal Co.'s stock; 900 shares Denver Circle Real Estate Co.'s stock; 500 shares Denver Circle Railroad Co.'s stock; 495 shares Henry Mercantile Co.'s stock, Henry, Colo.; 300 shares Henry Town and Land Co.'s stock, Henry, Colo.; 1,000 shares Fruita Town and Land Co.'s stock; 985 shares Citizens Ditch and Land Co.'s stock; 3,000 shares Uncompahgre Canal's stock.
(Signed) "J. G. BATTERSON, President."
This is the same notice exhibited with the original bill. The supplemental bill then alleges that the stocks, with trifling exceptions, were sold in pursuance of this notice for much less than their real value; that the sale was brought about by the fraudulent and oppressive conduct (which is set out in detail) of the defendant, and was illegal and void; that the stock were of the value of more than one million dollars; and that the damages occasioned--
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moneyweight Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.
...Gillette v. Bate (C.C.) 12 F. 108; Colgate v. Telegraph Co. (C.C.) 19 F. 829; Spill v. Celluloid Mfg. Co. (C.C.) 22 F. 94; Henry v. Insurance Co. (C.C.) 45 F. 299; City Omaha v. Redick, 63 F. 1, 11 C.C.A. 1; Pittsburgh Co. v. Cowles Co. (C.C.) 64 F. 125, 127; Bissel Co. v. Goshen Co., 72 F.......
-
Hill v. Phelps
... ... U.S.App. 204, 211, 11 C.C.A. 1, 6, 63 F. 1, 6; Dias v ... Merle, 4 Paige, 259, 261; Henry v. Insurance Co ... (C.C.) 45 F. 299, 303; Story, Eq. Pl. Secs. 338a, 423; 1 ... Barb.Ch.Prac ... ...
-
Mitchell v. Big Six Development Co.
... ... different property.' ... To the ... same effect is Henry et al. v. Travelers' Ins. Co ... (C.C.) 45 F. 299. Caldwell, Circuit Judge, said: ... ...
-
City of Omaha v. Redick
... ... Paige, 259, and was stated and applied on the circuit, ... by Judge Caldwell, in Henry v. Insurance Co., 45 F ... 299, 303. The rule of practice in question is likewise ... approved ... ...