Herbert v. Corby

Decision Date20 December 1940
Docket NumberNo. 35.,35.
Citation17 A.2d 541,125 N.J.L. 502
PartiesMay C. HERBERT, Ex'x, etc., Respondent, v. Emily CORBY et al., Appellants.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Appeal from Supreme Court.

Alfred J. Grosso, of Orange, for appellants.

Howe & Davis, of Orange, and Charles E. Garrett, of East Orange, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court, reported at 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240.

For affirmance: Justices HEHER and PERSKIE and Judges DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, and HAGUE—6.

For reversal: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, CASE, and BODINE, and Judge WELLS—5.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Kessler v. Tarrats
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • April 18, 1983
    ...The measure of damages was breach of contract). In Herbert v. Corby, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240 (Sup.Ct.1940), aff'd o.b., 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541 (E. & A.1940), plaintiff mortgagee was held to have an enforceable contract claim, as a third-party beneficiary, for the amount of a defici......
  • Harrington v. Harrington.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • February 28, 1948
    ...490, 133 A. 718; Di Girolamo v. Di Matteo, 108 N.J.Eq. 592, 156 A. 24; Herbert v. Corby, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240, affirmed 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541; Hufnagel v. Scholp, 138 N.J.Eq. 16, 46 A.2d 394. In Di Girolamo v. Di Matteo, supra, Vice Chancellor Buchanan said, at page 595 of 108 ......
  • Link v. Wabash Railroad Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 25, 1962
  • Alexander v. Manza.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • February 16, 1944
    ...based upon a deficiency against an assuming grantee. Herbert v. Corby, Sup.1940, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240, affirmed Err. & App. 1940, 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541, and followed in Woodbridge v. DeAngelis, 125 N.J.L. 579, 17 A.2d 542; Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Multiple Realty, etc., Co.,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT