Herbert v. Corby
Decision Date | 20 December 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 35.,35. |
Citation | 17 A.2d 541,125 N.J.L. 502 |
Parties | May C. HERBERT, Ex'x, etc., Respondent, v. Emily CORBY et al., Appellants. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Alfred J. Grosso, of Orange, for appellants.
Howe & Davis, of Orange, and Charles E. Garrett, of East Orange, for respondent.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court, reported at 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240.
For affirmance: Justices HEHER and PERSKIE and Judges DEAR, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, and HAGUE—6.
For reversal: The CHANCELLOR, Justices PARKER, CASE, and BODINE, and Judge WELLS—5.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kessler v. Tarrats
...The measure of damages was breach of contract). In Herbert v. Corby, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240 (Sup.Ct.1940), aff'd o.b., 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541 (E. & A.1940), plaintiff mortgagee was held to have an enforceable contract claim, as a third-party beneficiary, for the amount of a defici......
-
Harrington v. Harrington.
...490, 133 A. 718; Di Girolamo v. Di Matteo, 108 N.J.Eq. 592, 156 A. 24; Herbert v. Corby, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240, affirmed 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541; Hufnagel v. Scholp, 138 N.J.Eq. 16, 46 A.2d 394. In Di Girolamo v. Di Matteo, supra, Vice Chancellor Buchanan said, at page 595 of 108 ......
- Link v. Wabash Railroad Company
-
Alexander v. Manza.
...based upon a deficiency against an assuming grantee. Herbert v. Corby, Sup.1940, 124 N.J.L. 249, 11 A.2d 240, affirmed Err. & App. 1940, 125 N.J.L. 502, 17 A.2d 541, and followed in Woodbridge v. DeAngelis, 125 N.J.L. 579, 17 A.2d 542; Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Multiple Realty, etc., Co.,......