Heritage Ins. Co. of America v. Cilano, s. 82-981
Citation | 433 So.2d 1334 |
Decision Date | 06 July 1983 |
Docket Number | Nos. 82-981,82-1270,s. 82-981 |
Parties | HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, an Illinois corporation, Appellant, v. Frank CILANO, as Trustee of a dissolved corporation known as Best Point Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Richard Michaud, Appellees. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Daniel W. Levin, Miami, for appellant.
Dewey H. Varner, Jr., and Preston Mighdoll of Kohl, Springer, Springer, Varner, Mighdoll & Salnick, Palm Springs, for appellees.
This is an appeal of a final summary judgment declaring that Frank Cilano, as Trustee of a dissolved corporation known as Best Point Corporation, is covered under a liability insurance policy issued by Heritage Insurance Company of America.
The facts are not in dispute. Cilano operated a restaurant that sold liquor under a license that restricted liquor sales to 49 percent of the restaurant's total revenue. Cilano was sued by an individual who was injured at this restaurant during a fight. Cilano's restaurant was insured by Heritage, and he interpled Heritage as a third party defendant after Heritage denied coverage of this incident. Both parties agree that the relevant portions of the insurance policy are exclusion (h) and a provision referred to as the Host Liquor Law Liability Coverage clause. Exclusion (h) states that the policy shall not apply:
but part (ii) of this exclusion does not apply with respect to liability of the insured or his indemnitee as an owner or lessor described in (2) above.
The Host Liquor Law Liability Coverage clause provides:
IV. HOST LIQUOR LAW LIABILITY COVERAGE
Exclusion (h) does not apply with respect to liability of the insured or his indemnitee arising out of the giving or serving of alcoholic beverages at functions incidental to the named insured's business, provided the named insured is not engaged in the business of manufacturing, distributing, selling or serving of alcoholic beverages.
When the terms of an insurance policy are clear and unambiguous the terms must be applied as written, the court not being free to reshape the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State Auto. Ins. v. Young Men's Republican Club, Civ. A. No. 83-2907.
...Inc., 90 A.D.2d 631, 456 N.Y. S.2d 238 (1982), rev'd as moot, 59 N.Y.2d 983, 453 N.E.2d 1077 (N.Y.1983); Heritage Insurance Co. Cilano, 433 So.2d 1334 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 1983); Stewart v. Bohnert's Estate, 101 Cal. App.3d 978, 162 Cal.Rptr. 126 (Cal.Ct.App.1980); New Hampshire Insurance Co. ......
-
Lampliter Dinner Theater, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 85-7400
...Exclusion (h) and the Host Liability clause (or its analogs used by other companies) are not ambiguous. See Heritage Insurance Co. v. Cilano, 433 So.2d 1334 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983); Morrison v. Miller, 452 So.2d 390 (La.Ct.App.1984); New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Hillwinds Inn, Inc., 117 N.......
-
Wilson By and Through Wilson v. U.S. Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co., 87-4382
...clauses of which have been subjected to judicial scrutiny several times because of claims of ambiguity. See Heritage Ins. Co. v. Cilano, 433 So.2d 1334, 1335 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983); Morrison v. Miller, 452 So.2d 390, 391-92 (La.Ct.App.1984); New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Hillwinds Inn, Inc., 11......
-
U.S. Fidelity and Guar. v. Griggs
...result intended. See, e.g., Stewart v. Estate of Bohnert, 101 Cal.App.3d 978, 162 Cal.Rptr. 126 (1980); Heritage Insurance Co. of America v. Cilano, 433 So.2d 1334 (Fla.App. 4 Dist.1983); New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Hillwinds Inn, Inc., 117 N.H. 350, 373 A.2d 354 In Kelmo Enterprises, In......