Herndon v. Howard

Decision Date01 December 1869
Citation9 Wall. 664,19 L.Ed. 809,76 U.S. 664
PartiesHERNDON v. HOWARD
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

IN this case Herndon had taken an appeal from the Circuit Court for the Western District of Texas; and after doing so had become bankrupt. His assignee in bankruptcy—one Masterson—now moved to be admitted as a party appellant in the cause with the original appellant, Herndon.

His motion was supported by the production of the deed of assignment of the register in bankruptcy of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas, in the matter of his bankruptcy to Masterson, duly attested by the clerk of the court. The motion was founded upon the fourteenth section of the Bankrupt Law, which provides that the assignee in bankruptcy may prosecute and defend in his own name all suits at law and in equity pending at the time of the adjudication of bankruptcy, in which the bankrupt is a party, in the same manner and with the like effect as they might have been prosecuted or defendant by the bankrupt, and which makes a copy of the register's assignment, duly certified by the clerk of the proper court, conclusive evidence of the right of the assignee to use.

The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.

The section of the Bankrupt Law relied on, we think, governs the present case. It seems to require that Masterson, the assignee, be substituted as appellant for Herndon, the bankrupt, who may be said to be civiliter mortuus, precisely as an executor or administrator would be made party instead of an appellant actually deceased; and an order will be

MADE ACCORDINGLY.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Bankers' Mortg. Bond Co. v. Rosenthal
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 27, 1932
    ... ... B. & A. Railway Co. v. McGill, 194 Ala. 186, 69 So. 874, ... was of the right of a receiver to defend; Herndon v ... Howard, 9 Wall. 664, 19 L.Ed. 809, the right of an ... assignee admitted as an appellant in the Supreme Court of the ... United States. See ... ...
  • Kagey v. Fox West Coast Theatres Corp.
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1934
    ... ... and any right of appeal is exclusively in the trustee ... Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall. 379, 382, 20 L.Ed ... 414. True, in Herndon v. Howard, 9 Wall. 664, 19 ... L.Ed. 809, it was held that the proper procedure was for the ... assignee (trustee under the present act) to be ... ...
  • Whyel v. Jane Lew Coal & Coke Co.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • August 10, 1910
    ... ... Quite a different ... question would be prosecuted if it was the trustee in ... bankruptcy intervening. Herndon v. Howard, 9 Wall ... 664, 19 L.Ed. 809; Loveland on Bankruptcy, 360 and note 92 ...          But it ... is suggested that although ... ...
  • Carroll v. Hannon
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1927
    ...no further interest, and any right of appeal is exclusively in the trustee: Knox v. Exchange Bank, 12 Wall. 379, 382. True, in Herndon v. Howard, 9 Wall. 664, it was that the proper procedure was for the assignee (trustee under the present act) to be substituted, but what was said in that c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT