Herr v. Armor Corr. Health Servs., Inc.

Decision Date14 October 2020
Docket NumberCase No. 6:19-cv-394-Orl-37EJK
Citation494 F.Supp.3d 1197
Parties Joyce HERR, Plaintiff, v. ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida

John D. Middleton, Middleton & Middleton, P.A., Melrose, FL, for Plaintiff.

Eric J. Netcher, S. Renee Lundy, Courtney Lynn Tournade, Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, PA, Robindra Nath Khanal, Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, PA, Orlando, FL, for Defendant.

ORDER

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge

Defendant Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. ("Armor ") moves for summary judgment. (Doc. 103 ("Motion ").) Plaintiff responded. (Doc. 104.) On review, the Motion is denied.

I. BACKGROUND 1

On March 13, 2015, James Herr ("Herr "), a 71-year-old psychologist, had a standoff with the New Smyrna Beach Police Department, was arrested, and transported to the Volusia County Jail. (Doc. 103-1, p. 1; Doc. 103-6, p. 2.) Six days later, he died. (Doc. 103-2, pp. 9–10.) This action seeks to hold Armor, the private corporation responsible for medical care in the jail, accountable for what happened to Herr in those days. (See Doc. 17.)

A. Herr's Detention & Death

Herr suffered from high blood pressure

, anxiety, atrial fibrillation, a slow heart rate, and premature ventricular contractions—putting him at a high risk for cardiac arrest. (Doc. 103-6, pp. 2–3.) To ameliorate this risk, he was prescribed multiple medications: Clonazepam, Busiperone, and Diazpam for anxiety; Zolpidem for sleep; Lisinopril for blood pressure; and Imipramine for depression. (Id. at 3.)

Day One. On March 13, 2015, Armor tried to perform Herr's intake health screening, but failed because Herr refused. (Doc. 103-2, pp. 1–2.) The screener noted Herr made suicidal statements and should be placed on suicide watch—he was placed in the behavioral health unit. (Id. at 2, 20.) That day, Herr's mental health screening showed he was suffering from psychosis

. (Id. at 3.)

Day Two. At 8:45 a.m. the next day, on his way to his first appearance, Herr was taken to the clinic, but said, "get away from me—I don't want anyone touching me." (Id. at 9.) He was delusional or detoxing, singing "off we go into the wild blue yonder." (Id. at 19–20.)

Day Three. By March 15, Herr was sleeping and eating well. (Id. at 21.) He had a pleasant affect but was delusional and hallucinating. (Id. ) No screening was completed because Herr refused to cooperate. (Id. at 9.)

Day Four. Herr was still delusional and hallucinating—but mental health personnel noted critical statements from Herr: "PTSD, some medication." (Id. at 22.) Herr was naked in his cell and not providing logical answers. (Id. )

Day Five. On March 17, Herr was still delusional. (Id. at 23.) He said he felt fine, but Armor noted he appeared to be actively hallucinating, his thought processes were disorganized, and his memory was impaired. (Id. )

Day Six. At 1:45 p.m., mental health personnel reported Herr was calm and cooperative, answering questions appropriately. (Id. at 24.) But a progress note thirty-five minutes later said he refused to cooperate for a screening. (Id. at 9.)

Day Seven. On March 19 at 3:55 p.m., Herr was cursing mental health personnel and refusing to be interviewed. (Id. at 25.) At 11:07 p.m. that night, Herr cussed out the corrections officer making rounds. (Id. at 9, 12.) Two minutes later, Herr was found supine on his cell floor, pale in color, unresponsive, with no pulse. (Id. ) Jail staff attempted life-saving procedures but Herr was pronounced dead at 12:33 a.m. on March 20, 2015. (Id. at 9–10, 12.)

B. Cause of Death

Dr. Marcela Chiste performed Herr's autopsy. (Doc. 103-9, p. 1.) She listed the cause of death as hypertensive heart disease—an enlarged heart caused by high blood pressure

. (Id. ; Doc. 103-11, p. 12:2–4.) A heart should not weigh above 400 grams, but Herr's weighed 570 grams.

(Doc. 103-9, p. 5; Doc. 103-11, p. 12:19–20.) An enlarged heart is unstable and susceptible to sudden arrhythmia

. (Doc. 103-11, p. 12:9–11.) Sudden arrythmia killed Herr. (Id. at 21:16–20; Doc. 103-6, p. 5.)

Before his arrest, Herr was prescribed medications for anxiety, insomnia, depression, and high blood pressure

. (Doc. 103-6, p. 3.) Plaintiff's expert, Dr. Thomas Berger says Herr's lack of medication while in jail and extreme anxiety, stress, and lack of sleep caused the fatal arrhythmia.2 (Id. at 5.) He says if Herr received his medications and stressors were avoided, he would not have died. (Id. )

C. Armor's Written Policies & Practices

According to Armor's written policy, a screening is performed on all inmates that arrive in a facility so "emergent and urgent health needs are met." (Doc. 104-3, p. 1.) Anyone mentally unstable "or otherwise urgently in need of medical attention" is referred immediately for care. (Id. ) The intake screening assesses the inmate's current and past health considerations, including prescribed medications, which are to be maintained. (Id. at 1–2, 5.) If a patient "refuses to be screened or is ‘unscreenable’ due to mental health" he "will be held in intake housing or medical observation until the screening can be completed." (Id. at 5.) If a patient refuses treatment, "medical staff shall make reasonable efforts to convince the patient to voluntarily accept treatment." (Doc. 104-2, p. 3.) And "[i]f there is concern about decision-making capacity, an evaluation is done, especially if the refusal is for critical or acute care." (Id. at 2.)

But some of these written policies were not followed as explained by Charity Bernard ("C. Bernard "), an Armor charge nurse working when Herr was at the Volusia County Jail. (See Doc. 104-1, pp. 16:17–19, 36:6–10.) Instead, those incompetent inmates refusing to be medically screened are sent to the mental health block—not the clinic. (Id. at 36:6–10, 41:2–42:2.) A nurse is tasked with going to the mental health block once a shift to see if incompetent inmates will answer questions. (Id. at 34:15–18.) It's up to the mental health department to communicate with the medical department—both to report concerns or an inmate's level of cooperation. (Id. at 44:2–13, 52:5–21.) This communication sometimes breaks down. (Id. ) Unless there is a known medical problem, the nurses don't take an inmate's vitals. (Id. at 45:2–46:3, 47:23–48:4.)

D. Herr's Medical Care

Registered nurse, Linda Bernard ("L. Bernard "), who worked in correctional healthcare for twenty years, opined on Armor's treatment of Herr. (Doc. 103-5.) She says Armor failed to meet nationally accepted medical practices for the correctional setting. (Id. at 3–4, 19–21.) Armor failed to do an appropriate intake screening, which requires a complete set of vitals, comprehensive review of medical history, and a discussion of medications—a screening which should have been completed in the first twenty-four hours. (Id. at 3–4.) If Herr refused to be screened, L. Bernard says he should have been monitored by medical staff until he could be referred to a health care provider for evaluation and education on non-compliance. (Id. at 4.) If a patient still refuses to be evaluated, he may need to be referred to a hospital. (Id. ) L. Bernard says Herr exhibited serious medical need when he was incoherent—so he should have been evaluated for medical conditions or to assess whether he was competent to refuse. (Id. ) L. Bernard also points out that Armor did not obtain medical information from Herr's family, local pharmacies, or local hospitals. (Id. )

And she contended that Herr's lack of medical treatment was much like multiple others in Armor's care. (Id. at 4–19.) Based on her comparison of sixteen other inmates to Herr, she identified a practice of problems with: screening, medication services, inmates’ special needs, chronic disease services, coordination of care, information on health services, refusals, and emergency services. (Id. )

So Plaintiff, Herr's wife, sued Armor for violating Herr's Fourteenth Amendment right. (Doc. 17.) Armor moves for summary judgment. (Doc. 103.) With Plaintiff's response (Doc. 104), the matter is ripe.

II. LEGAL STANDARDS

Summary judgment is appropriate only "if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and [it] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) ; Celotex Corp. v. Catrett , 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). A court must view the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn from the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, Battle v. Bd. of Regents for Ga. , 468 F.3d 755, 759 (11th Cir. 2006), so "when conflicts arise between the facts evidenced by the parties, [the court] credit[s] the nonmoving party's version ," Evans v. Stephens , 407 F.3d 1272, 1278 (11th Cir. 2005). But the "court need not permit a case to go to a jury ... when the inferences that are drawn from the evidence, and upon which the non-movant relies, are ‘implausible.’ " Mize v. Jefferson City Bd. of Educ. , 93 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted).

III. ANALYSIS

Plaintiff alleges Armor violated Herr's constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment by exhibiting deliberate indifference to Herr's serious medical needs while acting under color of state law.3 (Doc. 17.) Armor moves for summary judgment, arguing no reasonable jury could find: (1) Armor acted with deliberate indifference to Herr's medical needs; (2) Armor had a policy or custom of ignoring inmates’ medical needs; (3) Armor's actions caused Herr's death; or (4) punitive damages are warranted. (Doc. 103.) Let's address each.

A. Deliberate Indifference

Pretrial detainees, like Herr, "have a Fourteenth Amendment due process right to receive medical treatment for illness and injuries, which encompasses a right to psychiatric and mental health care." Cook ex rel. Est. of Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe Cnty., Fla. , 402 F.3d 1092, 1115 (11th Cir. 2005) (cleaned up).4 Jail officials violate this right when they are...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Pringle v. Wexford Med. Sources
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Alabama
    • 12 Enero 2022
    ...... WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. ... against Defendants Wexford Health Sources, Inc. (“Wexford”) and. . ...Fla. Dep't of Corr. Sec'y , 952 F.3d 1257, 1266 (11th Cir. ... done solely by its employees.” Herr v. Armor Corr. Health Servs., Inc. , 494 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT