Herring v. Richmond Med. Ctr. for Women
| Citation | 75 USLW 3566,75 USLW 3563,167 L.Ed.2d 810,550 U.S. 901,75 USLW 3018,74 USLW 3352,127 S.Ct. 2094 |
| Decision Date | 23 April 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 05–730.,05–730. |
| Parties | Michael HERRING, in His Official Capacity as Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, Virginia, et al., petitioners, v. RICHMOND MEDICAL CENTER FOR WOMEN, et al. |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Case below, Richmond Medical Center for Women v. Hicks, 409 F.3d 619.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 167 L.Ed.2d 480 (2007).
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
U.S. v. Brooks
...rule that one panel of this court may not overrule another"), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Herring v. Richmond Med. Ctr., ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2094, 167 L.Ed.2d 810 (2007); McMellon v. United States, 387 F.3d 329, 333-34 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc) (holding that when two panel decision......
- Nixon v. Reprod. Health Servs. of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region, Inc.