Heyward v. United States
| Citation | 2 F.2d 467 |
| Decision Date | 14 November 1924 |
| Docket Number | No. 4412.,4412. |
| Parties | HEYWARD v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Wallace Miller, of Macon, Ga., for appellant.
F. G. Boatright, U. S. Atty., of Cordele, Ga., and B. S. Deaver, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Macon, Ga.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and KING, Circuit Judges.
On November 22, 1919, W. J. Marshall and R. L. Crandall dissolved the W. J. Marshall Company, a partnership, under which name they had for several years, including the year 1917, been engaged in business, and organized the W. J. Marshall Company, a corporation, with a capital stock of $100,000. Marshall and Crandall divided up between themselves partnership assets of the value of $18,000, transferred the remainder of such assets to the corporation, and received in return its capital stock of the par value of $95,000, in proportion to their interests in the partnership. The remaining $5,000 of the capital stock was issued to the bookkeeper, to be paid for out of the earnings of the corporation. The corporation acquired no assets other than the assets of the partnership. In short, the partnership was incorporated. The corporation continued in the business formerly carried on by the partnership, until it was, in December, 1922, adjudicated a bankrupt.
In February, 1923, the United States Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a tax of $8,326.29 for additional excess profits earned in 1917 by the partnership, and the United States filed its claim for the tax with the trustee of the estate of the bankrupt corporation. The District Court held that the government's claim had priority over the claims of other creditors, and ordered it paid in full. The trustee in bankruptcy appeals.
The liability of the partnership was for a tax. That tax accrued in 1917, and then became a lien against the property of the partnership. The corporation took this property subject to the tax lien, because it had notice through the former partners, Marshall and Crandall, who are chargeable with notice, although the assessment was not recorded until after the partnership assets were acquired. The bankrupt does not occupy the position of a purchaser without notice, and therefore is not entitled to rely on R. S. § 3186 (Comp. St. § 5908). Actual notice to it took the place of record notice. Nor is it material that the trustee in bankruptcy had no notice, actual or constructive, of the bankrupt's liability for a tax due to the United States. This is...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Hunt
...held that having actual notice has been held to take the place of, or requirement for, constructive notice, citing Heyward v. United States, 2 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1924); Gable, Inc. v. Kerl, 334 Pa. 441, 6 A.2d 275 (1939); Anno. 122 A.L.R. The IRS contends, however, that there is no authorit......
-
United States v. Hunt
...(5th Cir. 1958). Having actual notice has been held to take the place of, or requirement for, constructive notice. See Heyward v. United States, 2 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1924); Gable Inc. v. Kerl, 334 Pa. 441, 6 A.2d 275 (Pa.1939); annotation, 122 A.L.R. Therefore, for the reasons set forth her......
-
United States v. Beaver Run Coal Co., 6637.
...becoming entirely worthless, and made it possible for two hundred men to continue supporting their families. The case of Heyward v. United States, 5 Cir., 2 F.2d 467, cited by the government in support of its contention that Section 3186 provides protection only for mortgagees, purchasers a......
-
United States v. Heffron
...132 F.2d 345; Jones v. Kemp, 10 Cir., 144 F.2d 478. 6 See § 67, sub. b of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 107, sub. b; Heyward v. United States, 5 Cir., 2 F.2d 467; In re F. MacKinnon Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 24 F.2d 156; In re Pennsylvania Central Brewing Co., ...