Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc., s. 88-2769

Decision Date23 December 1991
Docket Number88-2817,Nos. 88-2769,s. 88-2769
Citation952 F.2d 991
Parties57 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 835, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,138 Kenneth G. HICKS, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. BROWN GROUP, INC., d/b/a Brown Shoe Company, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Before McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and FAGG, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Before the court are motions of appellee Kenneth G. Hicks to vacate this court's judgment of October 9, 1991, 946 F.2d 1344, and to extend the stay of mandate entered on October 31, 1991, and effective through December 30, 1991. For the reasons discussed below, we deny both motions.

In October 1988, the district court entered judgment for Hicks following a jury trial in Hicks' action under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 alleging racially discriminatory termination of employment. On April 16, 1990, this panel affirmed the judgment of the district court. Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc., 902 F.2d 630 (8th Cir.1990). On March 18, 1991, the Supreme Court vacated the panel's opinion and remanded the case for further consideration in light of this court's then-pending en banc decision in Taggart v. Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit. Brown Group, Inc. v. Hicks, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1299, 113 L.Ed.2d 234 (1991).

On June 6, 1991, this court ruled in Taggart that the Supreme Court's decision in Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 491 U.S. 164, 109 S.Ct. 2363, 105 L.Ed.2d 132 (1989), precluded discriminatory discharge claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Taggart v. Jefferson County Child Support Enforcement Unit, 935 F.2d 947, 948 (8th Cir.1991) (en banc). Accordingly, on October 9, 1991, this panel issued an order reversing the district court in Hicks and remanding the case with instructions to dismiss Hicks' complaint with prejudice. Hicks sought a stay of the mandate, which was granted until December 30, 1991.

On November 21, 1991, President Bush signed the Civil Rights Act of 1991 into law. Section 101(2)(b) of the Act amends 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to include the following language:

For purposes of this section, the term 'make and enforce contracts' includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.

Civil Rights Act of 1991, § 101(2)(b) (text of S. 1745 as approved by House and Senate Nov. 7, 1991).

In his motion to vacate this court's judgment of October 9, 1991, Hicks argues that this provision of the Act should apply retrospectively to his action against Brown Group, Inc. In view of the Supreme Court's previous remand of this matter, we...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Thomas v. St. Luke's Health Systems, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of West Virginia
    • November 21, 1994
    ...(8th Cir.1991) (en banc); see also Valdez v. Mercy Hosp., 961 F.2d 1401, 1403-04 (8th Cir.1992) (citing Taggart); Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc., 952 F.2d 991, 992 (8th Cir.1991) (citing Taggart), rev'd on other grounds and remanded, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 1255, 117 L.Ed.2d 485 (1992). However......
  • Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • December 30, 1992
    ...Enforcement Unit, 935 F.2d 947 (8th Cir.1991). Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc., 946 F.2d 1344 (8th Cir.), motion to vacate denied, 952 F.2d 991 (8th Cir.1991). Hicks then sought a writ of certiorari and the Supreme Court again remanded, this time "for further consideration in light of the Civil ......
  • Cook v. Foster Forbes Glass
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • February 21, 1992
    ...that the question of retroactive application of the Act should be presented to the Supreme Court for resolution. Hicks v. Brown Shoe Group, 952 F.2d 991 (1991). Nonetheless, the issue is now before this Court. The question is whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991 applies to cases pending on ......
  • West v. Pelican Management Services Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • February 3, 1992
    ...seeks compensatory or punitive damages under this section ... any party may demand a trial by jury...." 2 See also Hicks v. Brown Group, Inc., 952 F.2d 991 (8th Cir.1991) (declining to conduct en banc review of the retroactivity question under the Act in another context so that the parties ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT