Hicks v. Dobbs, 78-2261
| Decision Date | 08 February 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 78-2261,78-2261 |
| Parties | Hicks v. Dobbs |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
N.D.Ga.
AFFIRMED ***
*** Opinion contains citation(s) or special notations.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Scherer v. Davis
...408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Hannan v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 80 S.Ct. 1502, 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960); Hicks v. Dobbs, 612 F.2d 577 (5th Cir. 1980). The fundamental requirement of due process is "the opportunity to be heard." Grannis v. Ordean, 234 U.S. 385, 394, 34 S.Ct.......
-
Russell v. Harrison
...from the facts of each case. See, e.g., Glenn v. Newman, 614 F.2d 467 (5th Cir.1980) (post-termination proceeding); Hicks v. Dobbs, 612 F.2d 577 (5th Cir.1980) (flexible concept of procedural due process requirement to be discerned from facts of case); Ferguson v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 852, 856 ......
-
Glenn v. Newman
...that legal processes follow the forms of law, be appropriate to the case, and be just to the parties involved); Hicks v. Dobbs, 612 F.2d 577 (5th Cir. 1980) (requirements of procedural due process are flexible concepts to be discerned from the facts of each case); Robbins v. U.S.R.R. Retire......
-
SOUTH FLA. GROWERS ASS'N v. US DEPT. OF AGR.
...This concept of due process is a flexible one. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Hicks v. Dobbs, 612 F.2d 577 (5th Cir.1980); Scherer v. Davis, 543 F.Supp. 4 The central meaning of procedural due process has been repeatedly made clear: "Parties whose r......
Request a trial to view additional results