Hicks v. Old Republic Life Ins. Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtARNOLD
CitationHicks v. Old Republic Life Ins. Co., 29 N.C.App. 561, 225 S.E.2d 164 (N.C. App. 1976)
Decision Date02 June 1976
Docket NumberNo. 7610SC113,7610SC113
PartiesCornelia P. HICKS v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

C. K. Brown, Jr., and William L. Thompson, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Emanuel & Thompson, by W. Hugh Thompson, Raleigh, for defendant appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court's granting summary judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because there is a genuine issue of fact presented as to the cause of death of Roy Hicks. We disagree.

Upon a motion for summary judgment, the burden is upon the moving party to establish that there is no genuine issue of fact remaining for determination and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. First Federal Savings and Loan Assoc. v. Trust Co., 282 N.C. 44, 191 S.E.2d 683 (1972); Sanders v. Davis, 25 N.C.App. 186, 212 S.E.2d 554 (1975).

The defendant, as the moving party, supported its motion for summary judgment, as provided by Rule 56, with exhibits (the death certificate and supplemental death certificates), answers to interrogatories and a deposition. Through its evidentiary material defendant established by expert medical opinion that Roy Hicks died as a result of a myocardial infarction which was due to coronary arteriosclerosis. Death of the insured from myocardial infarction would prohibit the beneficiary from recovering under the accidental insurance policy coverage and entitle defendant to a judgment as a matter of law.

Since defendant's evidentiary matter established that cause of death was due to heart failure the plaintiff had the burden to respond by affidavit or other evidentiary matter to establish that there was a genuine issue for trial with respect to the cause of death, i.e., that the cause of death was not...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Ellice v. INA Life Ins. Co. of New York
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • July 5, 1988
    ...510, 511 (Ky.1969); Lindemann v. General American Life Ins. Co., 485 S.W.2d 477, 480 (Mo.App.1972); Hicks v. Old Republic Life Ins. Co., 29 N.C.App. 561, 564, 225 S.E.2d 164 (1976); Dunn v. Maryland Casualty Co., 339 Pa.Super. 70, 72, 75-76, 488 A.2d 313 (1985); Connecticut General Life Ins......
  • Emanuel v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 1978
    ...the classification of arteriosclerosis is a question of fact for the jury. The facts, language and holdings in Hicks v. Insurance Co., 29 N.C.App. 561, 225 S.E.2d 164 (1976); Horn v. Insurance Co., 265 N.C. 157, 143 S.E.2d 70 (1965); and Skillman v. Insurance Co., 258 N.C. 1, 127 S.E.2d 789......
  • McGee v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 8028DC716
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 3, 1981
    ...S.E.2d 392, 410 (1976). Defendant also contends that Horn v. Insurance Co., 265 N.C. 157, 143 S.E.2d 70 (1965); Hicks v. Insurance Co., 29 N.C.App. 561, 225 S.E.2d 164 (1976); and Hooks v. Insurance Co., 43 N.C.App. 606, 259 S.E.2d 567 (1979) contain the controlling rules of law as to accid......
  • State v. Pollard
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 2, 1976
    ... ... ' a reasonable belief that such actions were necessary to protect his life. Defendant argues that the use of the phrase 'person of ordinary ... ...