Higgins v. Schneider, A--10
| Citation | 164 A.2d 299,33 N.J. 299 |
| Decision Date | 10 October 1960 |
| Docket Number | No. A--10,A--10 |
| Parties | Timothy HIGGINS, an infant, etc., Plaintiff, and Charles A. Higgins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William A. SCHNEIDER, Defendant-Respondent. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Stanley W. Greenfield, Elizabeth, for appellant.
Edward C. Hillis, Newark, for respondent (Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, Newark, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, 61 N.J.Super. 36, 160 A.2d 165, for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Haneman in the court below.
Mr. Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Mr. Justice SCHETTINO vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Freund.
For affirmance: Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and HALL--5.
For reversal: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justice SCHETTINO--2.
To continue reading
Request your trial
12 cases
-
Fernandi v. Strully
...context less than a year ago. Higgins v. Schneider, 61 N.J.Super. 36, 43, 160 A.2d 165 (App.Div.1960), affirmed on opinion below 33 N.J. 299, 164 A.2d 299 (1960). In Veghte, Justice Magie quoted a meaningful sentence from an early opinion (McIver v. Ragan, 2 Wheat. 25, 4 L.Ed. 175) by Chief......
-
Carter v. University of Medicine & Dentistry
...228 N.J.Super. 17, 19, 548 A.2d 528 (Law Div. 1988); Higgins v. Schneider, 61 N.J.Super. 36, 160 A.2d 165 (App.Div.), aff'd, 33 N.J. 299, 164 A.2d 299 (1960); Orr v. Orr, 36 N.J. 236, 176 A.2d 241 (1961); Maccia v. Tynes, 39 N.J.Super. 1, 120 A.2d 263 (App.Div.1956). Defendants contend that......
-
Henry v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
...only be set up by the infant and his representative. See Higgins v. Schneider, 61 N.J.Super. 36, 160 A.2d 165 (App.Div.), aff'd, 33 N.J. 299, 164 A.2d 299 (1960). The Court will therefore dismiss the individual causes of action brought by the plaintiffs Gaston Henry and Lorraine Henry, and ......
-
Knutsen v. Brown
...Statute of Limitations by virtue of the case of Higgins v. Schneider, 61 N.J.Super. 36 (160 A.2d 165) (App.Div.1960), Affirmed, 33 N.J. 299 (164 A.2d 299) (1960) which held that a suit by a parent for injuries to his child if not instituted within two years is barred by N.J.S. 2A:14--2 (N.J......
Request a trial to view additional results