Highmark Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan Inc., No. 01-1377

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
Writing for the CourtRosenn
Citation276 F.3d 160
Parties(3rd Cir. 2001) HIGHMARK, INCORPORATED, v. UPMC HEALTH PLAN, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT Argued:
Docket NumberNo. 01-1377
Decision Date17 October 2001
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
192 practice notes
  • West Penn Allegheny Health Sys. Inc. v. Upmc, No. 09-4468
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • November 29, 2010
    ...Highmark and preliminarily enjoined dissemination of the advertisement; we affirmed on appeal. Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 171-73 (3d Cir.2001). In another 2001 lawsuit, Highmark sought to enjoin UPMC's proposed acquisition of a children's hospital; Highmark clai......
  • In Re Title Insurance Antitrust Cases., Case No. 1:08CV677.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • March 31, 2010
    ...Co. v. Pireno, 458 U.S. 119, 129, 102 S.Ct. 3002, 73 L.Ed.2d 647 (1982). See 702 F.Supp.2d 868 Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 167, n. 1 (3d Cir.2001) (internal citation omitted) (“In [ United States v.] Fabe, [508 U.S. 491, 113 S.Ct. 2202, 124 L.Ed.2d 449 (1993) ], ......
  • Most Reverend David A. Zubik v. Sebelius, Nos. 13cv1459
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • November 21, 2013
    ...(quoting Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Reg'l Bd. of Educ., 307 F.3d 243, 252 (3d Cir.2002) quoting Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 170 (3d Cir.2001)). “A plaintiff seeking an injunction must meet all four criteria, as ‘[a] plaintiff's failure to establish any element in......
  • Mullinax v. Radian Guar. Inc., No. 1:00CV01247.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Middle District of North Carolina
    • January 25, 2002
    ...not significantly altered by the additional availability of a federal private remedy. See Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160 (3d Cir.2001) (finding that a federal law that provided private remedies did not interfere with the Pennsylvania's administrative regime establish......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
193 cases
  • West Penn Allegheny Health Sys. Inc. v. Upmc, No. 09-4468
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • November 29, 2010
    ...Highmark and preliminarily enjoined dissemination of the advertisement; we affirmed on appeal. Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 171-73 (3d Cir.2001). In another 2001 lawsuit, Highmark sought to enjoin UPMC's proposed acquisition of a children's hospital; Highmark clai......
  • In Re Title Insurance Antitrust Cases., Case No. 1:08CV677.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • March 31, 2010
    ...Co. v. Pireno, 458 U.S. 119, 129, 102 S.Ct. 3002, 73 L.Ed.2d 647 (1982). See 702 F.Supp.2d 868 Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 167, n. 1 (3d Cir.2001) (internal citation omitted) (“In [ United States v.] Fabe, [508 U.S. 491, 113 S.Ct. 2202, 124 L.Ed.2d 449 (1993) ], ......
  • Most Reverend David A. Zubik v. Sebelius, Nos. 13cv1459
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • November 21, 2013
    ...(quoting Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Reg'l Bd. of Educ., 307 F.3d 243, 252 (3d Cir.2002) quoting Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160, 170 (3d Cir.2001)). “A plaintiff seeking an injunction must meet all four criteria, as ‘[a] plaintiff's failure to establish any element in......
  • Mullinax v. Radian Guar. Inc., No. 1:00CV01247.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Middle District of North Carolina
    • January 25, 2002
    ...not significantly altered by the additional availability of a federal private remedy. See Highmark, Inc. v. UPMC Health Plan, Inc., 276 F.3d 160 (3d Cir.2001) (finding that a federal law that provided private remedies did not interfere with the Pennsylvania's administrative regime establish......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT