Hightire v. State, 30774

Citation247 Ind. 164,213 N.E.2d 707
Decision Date03 February 1966
Docket NumberNo. 30774,30774
PartiesWillie Lee HIGHTIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

Robert S. McCain, Ft. Wayne, for appellant.

John J. Dillon, Atty. Gen., Donald R. Ewers, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ARTERBURN, Judge.

The appellant was charged with and convicted of murder in the second degree. The only issue presented on this appeal is the contention that the evidence is undisputed showing that the appellant acted in self-defense. For that reason, we must briefly review the evidence under the circumstances most favorable to the State.

This shows that on October 18, 1964 appellant resided in Fort Wayne, Indiana. He had previously been divorced from his wife and was making support payments for his children. Clementine Jones, the wife of the decedent, Willie Junior Jones, lived in the same city with her children. She was married, but separated from the decedent. The evidence further shows that the appellant had been staying from time to time with Clementine Jones, paying the rent on the house where she lived and eating and sleeping there at times. The decedent also visited this home, as the evidence shows, almost every day, his wife laundering his clothing and preparing his lunch. On October 18, 1964 he and his wife had an argument and she called the police, who ordered him out of the home. The next day after Mrs. Jones had been visiting a relative at the hospital, her husband followed her into her house. The appellant was already there, lying in bed upstairs. He went to the door and found Mr. and Mrs. Jones were arguing. Mrs. Jones asked the appellant to make her husband leave. The appellant went to an upstairs bedroom, got a pistol, put it in his pocket and came downstairs to where the decedent was and asked the decedent to leave. The decedent refused to do so and the appellant drew the gun. At that time a companion of the decedent came in and tried to get the decedent to leave. He pushed him to the front door, but decedent threatened him with a knife and the companion desisted and went out to the car in which he had brought the decedent to the residence.

The evidence next is that appellant pushed the decedent out the door and hit him with the pistol and the decedent then got out a knife and the appellant shot him. There is some evidence that there was a scuffle between the parties before the firing of the shot. The daughter says she remembers her father telling Willie Lee Hightire, the appellant, to 'Leave me alone, I have had enough of your running over me' and she remembers seeing blood on her father's forehead before the second scuffle and the firing of the shot that killed him.

We cannot say that the evidence is without conflict and undisputed on the issue of self-defense. A defendant depending upon self-defense when...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Nuss v. State, 1--874A123
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • June 5, 1975
    ...good faith to fear death or great bodily harm. Bullard v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 190, 195 N.E.2d 856, 197 N.E.2d 295; Hightire v. State (1966), 248 Ind. 164, 213 N.E.2d 707. The burden is upon the State to show that defendant does not meet one or more of these requirements. Dorak v. State (......
  • White v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • August 22, 1968
    ...fear death or great bodily harm. Bullard v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 190, 195 N.E.2d 856, Rehearing Denied 197 N.E.2d 295; Hightire v. State (1966), Ind., 213 N.E.2d 707. The burden is upon the State to show that defendant does not meet one or more of these requirements. Dorak v. State (1915)......
  • Helms v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • October 30, 1968
    ...in good faith to fear death or great bodily harm. Bullard v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 190, 195 N.E.2d 856, 197 N.E.2d 295; Hightire v. State (1966), Ind., 213 N.E.2d 707. The burden is upon the State to show that defendant does not meet one or more of these requirements. Dorak v. State (1915)......
  • Banks v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1971
    ...good faith to fear death or great bodily harm. Bullard v. State (1964), 245 Ind. 190, 195 N.E.2d 856, 197 N.E.2d 295; Hightire v. State (1966), 247 Ind. 164, 213 N.E.2d 707. The burden is upon the State to show that defendant does not meet one or more of these requirements. Dorak v. State (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT