Hightower v. State, ED 109489

• Court: Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM.
• Citation: 642 S.W.3d 380 (Mem)
• Parties: David HIGHTOWER, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
• Docket Number: ED 109489
• Decision Date: 29 March 2022

642 S.W.3d 380 (Mem)

David HIGHTOWER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

ED 109489

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Filed: March 29, 2022

Amy E. Lowe, Public Defender Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Austin C. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO, 65102 for respondent.

Before Michael E. Gardner, P.J., James M. Dowd, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Hightower (Movant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted following a jury trial of one count of first-degree robbery and one count of armed criminal action. The trial court sentenced him to 18 years in prison for the armed criminal action charge and a concurrent 10 years for the robbery charge.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons

642 S.W.3d 381

for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).