Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Citation | Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 960 (2004) |
| Decision Date | 23 August 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-5554.,03-5554. |
| Parties | HIIBEL v. SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, ET AL. |
ante, p. 177. Petition for rehearing denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
Perez v. Weaver
...practice and a request that raises no Fourth Amendment concern.” Baker v. Smiscik, 49 F.Supp.3d 489, 500 (E.D. Mich. 2014) (citing Hiibel, 124 S.Ct. at 2458 the ordinary course a police officer is free to ask a person for identification without implicating the Fourth Amendment .... Our deci......
2 books & journal articles
-
6.5 Nature of the Privilege
...See, e.g., United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115 (1980).[71] Hiilbel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Nev., 542 U.S. 177, reh'g denied, 542 U.S. 960 (2004).[72] See, e.g., Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Comm'n of Investigation, 406 U.S. 472 (1972). "It is well established that the privilege......
-
3.8 Stop and Frisk
...ticket given to have dog sniff around defendant's vehicle).[176] Hiilbel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Nev., 542 U.S. 177, reh'g denied, 542 U.S. 960 (2004). See ¶ 6.504(A) of this book.[177] Fogg v. Commonwealth, 31 Va. App. 722, 525 S.E.2d 596 (2000).[178] Harris v. Commonwealth, 241 Va.......