Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada

Decision Date20 October 2003
Docket NumberNo. 03-5554.,03-5554.
Citation540 U.S. 965
PartiesHIIBEL v. SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, ET AL.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Nev.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 118 Nev. 868, 59 P. 3d 1201.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Blakely v. Washington, No. 02-1632 (U.S. June 24, 2004)
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 24, 2004
    ... ... WASHINGTON ... CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF WASHINGTON ... No. 02-1632 ... " sentence of 90 months after making a judicial determination that he had acted with "deliberate ... consider whether this violated petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury ... ...
  • U.S. v. Levy
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 3, 2004
    ... ... No. 01-17133 ... United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit ... December 3, ...       Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No ... sentencing scheme did not violate the Sixth Amendment because the additional facts found by ... Rather, this Court, out of concerns for judicial economy and finality, has elected to adopt and ... ...
  • Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt Cty.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 21, 2004
    ... 542 U.S. 177 ... SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF NEVADA, HUMBOLDT COUNTY, ET AL ... No. 03-5554 ... Supreme Court of United States ... Argued March 22, 2004 ... Decided June 21, ... ...
  • U.S. v. McCann, 03-1174.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • May 5, 2004
    ...some (indirect) guidance on the identification-question issue: certiorari was granted in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Ct. of Nevada, 540 U.S. 965, 124 S.Ct. 430, 157 L.Ed.2d 309 (2003), apparently to determine whether a state statute requiring the subject of an investigative detention to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT