Hill v. Hawes, No. 4
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | ROBERTS |
| Citation | 64 S.Ct. 334,149 A.L.R. 736,88 L.Ed. 283,320 U.S. 520 |
| Docket Number | No. 4 |
| Decision Date | 03 January 1944 |
| Parties | HILL v. HAWES |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
93 practice notes
-
Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America, No. 72-1709.
...and then reinstating it for purposes of allowing time to file a notice of appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court in Hill v. Hawes, 320 U.S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283 (1944). But in the 1946 amendment to Rule 77(d), the following sentence was added: Lack of notice of the entry by the c......
-
Braden v. University of Pittsburgh, No. 75-1657
...in note 1 supra. 21 See Note, Interlocutory Appeals in the Federal Courts Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), 88 Harv.L.Rev. 607, 616 (1975). 22 320 U.S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283 23 Id. at 523, 64 S.Ct. at 336. 24 See Notes of Advisory Committee on Rule 77(d), quoted in 7 Moore's Federal Prac......
-
Charlson Realty Company v. United States, No. 388-62.
...court possesses the power to extend the time for appeal beyond the statutory period by any form of judicial action * * *." Hill v. Hawes, 320 U.S. 520, 525, 64 S.Ct. 334, 336, 88 L.Ed. 283 (1944) (Stone, C. J., dissenting). Though we might, if we were legislators, prefer to change some of t......
-
Washington v. Ryan, No. 05–99009
...the authority, in certain circumstances, to vacate and reenter a judgment to restore the opportunity to appeal. See Hill v. Hawes , 320 U.S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283 (1944). The Federal Rules have been amended since Hill , and some of those amendments limit the relief available to pa......
Request a trial to view additional results
94 cases
-
Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America, 72-1709.
...and then reinstating it for purposes of allowing time to file a notice of appeal was upheld by the Supreme Court in Hill v. Hawes, 320 U.S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283 (1944). But in the 1946 amendment to Rule 77(d), the following sentence was added: Lack of notice of the entry by the c......
-
Richards v. United States, 10700.
...Amendments to Rules, appended to Rule 58, F.R.Civ.P. in 28 U. S.C.A.; Milton v. United States, 5 Cir., 120 F.2d 794. Cf. Hill v. Hawes, 320 U. S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283. 2 We recognize, of course, that the time of perfecting an appeal is a jurisdictional matter, and that we lack po......
-
Charlson Realty Company v. United States, 388-62.
...court possesses the power to extend the time for appeal beyond the statutory period by any form of judicial action * * *." Hill v. Hawes, 320 U.S. 520, 525, 64 S.Ct. 334, 336, 88 L.Ed. 283 (1944) (Stone, C. J., dissenting). Though we might, if we were legislators, prefer to change some of t......
-
Braden v. University of Pittsburgh, 75-1657
...in note 1 supra. 21 See Note, Interlocutory Appeals in the Federal Courts Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), 88 Harv.L.Rev. 607, 616 (1975). 22 320 U.S. 520, 64 S.Ct. 334, 88 L.Ed. 283 23 Id. at 523, 64 S.Ct. at 336. 24 See Notes of Advisory Committee on Rule 77(d), quoted in 7 Moore's Federal Prac......
Request a trial to view additional results