Hill v. Mcdonough
| Decision Date | 14 April 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 05-8794.,05-8794. |
| Citation | 164 L. Ed. 2d 414,547 U.S. 1067,126 S. Ct. 1674 |
| Parties | HILL <I>v.</I> MCDONOUGH, INTERIM SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Certiorari granted sub nom. Hill v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al., 546 U. S. 1158.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Fitts v. Lumpkin
... ... and an opportunity to explain why the Petition is not ... time-barred.[7] See Day v. McDonough, 126 ... S.Ct. 1674, 1684 (2006) (noting that a court must assure that ... the parties have "fair notice and an opportunity to ... ...
-
Hill v. Lumpkin
...in full, giving notice and an opportunity to explain why this action is not barred by 28 U.S.C.§ 2244(d).9 See Day v. McDonough, 126 S. Ct. 1674, 1684 (2006) (noting that a court must assure that the parties have "fair notice and an opportunity to present their positions" before dismissing ......
- Brigham City v. Stuart