Hill v. State

Docket NumberS11A1914
Decision Date06 February 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
29 cases
  • Reed v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • April 24, 2012
    ...to a concession by the State. Reed appeals, understandably raising no error regarding the vacated sentence. See Hill v. State, 290 Ga. 493, 722 S.E.2d 708 (2012).* 1. Construed most strongly in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows that Reed began arguing with Gatson during a party at......
  • Woodard v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 27, 2015
    ...disputed appellant's assertion of self-defense, and thus overwhelmingly supported the jury's finding of guilt. See Hill v. State, 290 Ga. 493, 722 S.E.2d 708 (2012) (where evidence of guilt was overwhelming, appellant failed to establish how counsel's failure to seek a jury charge on a defe......
  • Kesterson v. Jarrett
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 18, 2012
    ...to be present may be waived or forfeited by a party. A party may choose not to attend all or part of her trial, see Hill v. State, 290 Ga. 493, 494, 722 S.E.2d 708 (2012), or affirmatively waive presence during all or part of a proceeding, see Ward, 288 Ga. at 646, 706 S.E.2d 430. But becau......
  • Deleon-Alvarez v. Palacios-Baras
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 28, 2014
    ...was saving himself by cooperating with the state and testifying against defendant). 45.466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 46.Hill v. State, 290 Ga. 493, 499(7), 722 S.E.2d 708 (2012) (citations and punctuation omitted). 47. Supra. 48.Id. at 424–425(1), 736 S.E.2d 397, citi......
  • Get Started for Free