Hill v. State

Decision Date05 February 1924
Docket Number5 Div. 438.
PartiesHILL v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1924.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tallapoosa County; S. L. Brewer, Judge.

Bud Hill was convicted of having in his possession prohibited liquors, and appeals. Affirmed.

Jas. W Strother, of Dadeville, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

SAMFORD J.

The evidence in this case is entirely circumstantial. As circumstances tending to prove the guilt of defendant and connecting him with the liquor, it was relevant and competent to prove that defendant was traveling in a Ford car; that when he was told by the officer to halt he "swerved around the officer" and speeded up the car; that the officer pursued the car; that the officer caught defendant in the car after a chase of about seven miles near a cemetery; that the defendant "was drinking"; that at that time the officer smelled whisky on defendant and in the car; that under the front cushion of the car there were cobs broken up about an inch and one-half long; that defendant was running the car as fast as it would go; that shortly after the arrest the officer went back to where he first saw defendant and picked up a Coca-Cola bottle and a pint bottle; that in the pint bottle there was a little corn whisky; that these bottles were in the edge of the road where defendant had passed; that it was about one hour from the time defendant had passed; that further down the road where defendant had passed the officer found a board carton with excelsior in it; that it had on the carton the name of a man who lived near defendant; that this was about 9 p. m.; that the next morning about daylight the officer examined the road where defendant had been along the night before; that there was no other sign of travel except the car of defendant; that on the route taken by defendant's car the night before the officer found a quart bottle of whisky "hung up in a thick briar patch," which had a cob stopper; that just a little below this on the edge of the same road he found a quart bottle broken, and near it a cob stopper that fitted the bottle; that another quart bottle was found on the road, thrown right on the bank on the right side, with a cob stopper; that the whisky was what is known as corn whisky; that the officer was familiar with and knew the smell of corn whisky; that the car smelled of corn whisky. Many questions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Ex parte Hill
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1924
    ...of Bud Hill for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision there rendered in the case of Hill v. State, 100 So. 314. Writ Jas. W. Strother, of Dadeville, for petitioner. Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., opposed. THOMAS, J. After a discussion of rulings on......
  • Dyson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 6, 1939
    ... ... decisions in the following cases: Bryant v. State, ... 116 Ala. 445, 446, 23 So. 40; Prater v. State, 107 ... Ala. 26, 27, 18 So. 238; Cannon v. State, 17 ... Ala.App. 82, 81 So. 860; McKenzie v. State, 19 ... Ala.App. 319, 97 So. 155; Hill v. State, 19 Ala.App ... 618, 100 So. 314 ... The ... refused charge 13 was held to be good and its refusal ... reversible error in Fetner v. State, 22 Ala.App ... 128, 113 So. 467. The holding in the Fetner case, supra, is ... based upon the decisions in Brown v. State, 118 Ala ... ...
  • Price v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • August 19, 1924
    ... ... charge 6 was applicable to the evidence in this case and ... should have been given. Bryant v. State, 116 Ala ... 446, 23 So. 40; Prater v. State, 107 Ala. 27, 18 So ... 238; Cannon v. State, 17 Ala. App. 82, 81 So. 860; ... McKenzie v. State (Ala. App.) 97 So. 155; Bud ... Hill v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 314; In re Bud ... Hill v. State (Sup. Ct.) 100 So. 315 ... Other ... charges refused to defendant appear to have been covered by ... the oral charge of the court, or by given charges. Such as ... were not so covered were properly refused, for not stating ... ...
  • Latner v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 1924
    ... ... from circumstantial evidence, and hence charge No. 3 ... requested in writing was abstract and misleading. The charge, ... under the evidence in this case, was properly refused ... Bosteen Tatum v. State (Ala. App.) 100 So. 569; Ex ... parte Bud Hill v. State, 19 Ala. App. 618, 100 So ... After ... the defendants had introduced twelve witnesses, who testified ... to the defendants' good character, the court asked ... defendants' counsel how many more witnesses he had to ... offer as to defendants' character. Counsel replied ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT