Hill v. United States, 12852.
Decision Date | 23 October 1956 |
Docket Number | No. 12852.,12852. |
Citation | 238 F.2d 84 |
Parties | James Francis HILL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Howard T. Cook, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.
John C. Crawford, Jr., and James M. Meek, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
The appellant was convicted and sentenced in the Eastern District of Tennessee for knowingly transporting in interstate commerce a stolen motor vehicle in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312 and for transporting in interstate commerce a person who had been kidnapped and held for ransom in violation of 18 U.S. C.A. § 1201. No appeal was taken from this conviction. He now comes before this court on appeal from an order denying his motion to vacate sentence filed in the district court pursuant to 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255. His appeal from the denial of a prior motion filed under that section was before us in Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 1955, 223 F.2d 699, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 867, 76 S. Ct. 113, where it was held that the district court's finding that the appellant had the mental capacity to stand trial was not, in the light of the record of the district court's hearing on that issue, open to collateral attack upon a motion to set aside the sentence. Nothing not already considered and disposed of by this court is presented by this appeal.
The order of the district court is accordingly affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hill v. United States
...268 F.2d 203 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 854, 80 S.Ct. 110, 4 L.Ed.2d 93; Hill v. United States, 256 F.2d 957 (C.A. 6); Hill v. United States, 238 F.2d 84 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1007, 77 S.Ct. 569, 1 L.Ed.2d 551; Hill v. United States, 223 F.2d 699 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 350......
-
United States v. Hill
...being no reversible error, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 1 Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 223 F. 2d 699; Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 238 F.2d 84; Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 256 F.2d 957; Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 268 F.2d 203; Hill v. United States, D.C., 186 F......
-
Hill v. United States
...petition was filed upon March 15, 1956, and this likewise was denied by the District Court and the judgment affirmed upon appeal. 6 Cir., 238 F.2d 84, cert. den. 352 U.S. 1007, 77 S.Ct. 569, 1 L.Ed.2d A third petition was filed upon December 19, 1957, and again denied by the District Court,......
-
Hill v. United States, 13741.
...opinion in that case gives the factual background of this litigation which is now before us for the fourth time. See also: Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 238 F.2d 84, and Hill v. United States, 6 Cir., 256 F.2d Hill v. United States, supra, 256 F.2d 957, was another proceeding to vacate sen......