Hillard v. Ala. Dep't of Corr., CR–10–1328.

• Court: Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
• Writing for the Court: KELLUM
• Citation: 93 So.3d 983
• Parties: Devane L. HILLARD v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
• Docket Number: CR–10–1328.
• Decision Date: 30 September 2011

93 So.3d 983

Devane L. HILLARD
v.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

CR–10–1328.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 2011.

Devane L. Hillard, pro se.

Luther Strange, atty. gen., and Anne Adams Hill, gen. counsel, and Kathryn D. Anderson, asst. atty. gen. and asst. gen. counsel, Alabama Department of Corrections, for appellee.

KELLUM, Judge.

The appellant, Devane L. Hillard, appeals from the circuit court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

On March 22, 2010, Hillard, who at that time was an inmate housed at the Bibb

[93 So.3d 984]

Correctional Facility, petitioned the Bibb Circuit Court for a writ of habeas corpus seeking credit for time he spent in jail awaiting his trial on the charge of robbery in the first degree. In his petition, Hillard alleged that he was arrested on July 27, 2008, and that he was charged with one count of first-degree robbery. Hillard further alleged that he remained incarcerated until his trial in the Houston Circuit Court on November 2, 2009, at which he was found guilty of first-degree robbery and was sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment. At that time, the Houston Circuit Court credited Hillard with 1 year and 103 days of jail credit. Hillard successfully appealed his conviction to this Court; we reversed his conviction and remanded the case to the Houston Circuit Court for further proceedings. See Hillard v. State, 53 So.3d 165 (Ala.Crim.App.2010). In an affidavit attached to his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Hillard alleged that he was resentenced in October 2010 by the Houston Circuit Court to a term of 20 years' imprisonment, split to serve 5 years' imprisonment followed by 5 years' supervised probation.¹ Hillard alleged that when the Houston Circuit Court sentenced him in October 2010 the court failed to give him credit for the time he spent incarcerated from July 2008 to October 2010, and that, based on his calculations, he was entitled to 799 days of jail credit.

On May 4, 2011, the Alabama Department of Corrections (“DOC”) filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a summary judgment, in which it argued that DOC could not properly address Hillard's challenge to the amount of jail credit certified on his conviction report because the responsibility of calculating and certifying the amount of actual jail credit an inmate is entitled to lies with the sentencing court and the circuit clerk. See § 15–18–5, Ala.Code 1975. In an attachment to the motion to dismiss, Mark...