Hilton v. C. I. R., 80-7654
| Decision Date | 08 March 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 80-7654,80-7654 |
| Citation | 671 F.2d 316 |
| Parties | 82-1 USTC P 9263 Carol W. HILTON, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
William M. Schindler, San Diego, Cal., argued, for petitioners-appellants; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, San Diego, Cal., Alan J. B. Aronsohn, Robinson, Silverman, Pearce, Aronshohn & Berman, New York City, on brief.
Robert S. Pomerance, Washington, D. C., argued, for respondent-appellee; Richard Farber, Michael L. Paup, M. Carr Ferguson, Washington, D. C., on brief.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court.
Before ELY, HUG and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.
The carefully reasoned opinion of the Tax Court is reported at 74 T.C. 305 (1980). The facts are clearly set forth in that opinion. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the Tax Court's opinion. In short, we agree that Estate of Franklin v. Commissioner, 544 F.2d 1045 (9th Cir. 1976), applies to this case and that the sale-leaseback transaction in Frank Lyon Co. v. United States, 435 U.S. 561, 98 S.Ct. 1291, 55 L.Ed.2d 550 (1978), is distinguishable.
Because of concerns raised by the Amicus, the National Realty Committee, Inc., however, we do place two specific caveats on the interpretation and application of the Tax Court's opinion.
First, in its discussion of the economic value of the transaction, the court looked at the future income potential available to the taxpayers based on its arguendo assumption that the taxpayers' economic analysis, which it had found to be "fatally defective," 74 T.C. at 353, was nevertheless accurate. Using a six percent rate of return, the court calculated that the taxpayers were facing a net loss from the transaction. Id. at 353 n.23. We deem the six percent rate to be for illustrative purposes only. No suggestion of a minimum required rate of return is made. Taxpayers are allowed to make speculative investments without forfeiting the normal tax applications to their actions.
Second, in distinguishing Frank Lyon Co., one of the factors noted by the Tax Court was that the present transaction involved a balloon payment, while in Frank Lyon Co. the entire purchase price was amortized during the primary lease period. 74 T.C. at 362-63. Although the inference could be drawn that the balloon payment per se weighed against the taxpayers, we do not so interpret the opinion. Balloon...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thomas v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (In re Estate of Thomas)
...and do not necessarily reflect an absence of ownership. See Hilton v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 305, 348 (1980), affd. per curiam 671 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 907 (1982); LTV Corp v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 39, 49-50 (1974). Similarly, the absence of significant positive ne......
-
ACM Partnership v. C.I.R.
...recognized, an appropriate means of assessing the transaction's actual and anticipated economic effects. See, e.g., Hilton v. Commissioner, 671 F.2d 316, 317 (9th Cir.1982) (affirming economic substance determination based on present value analysis of taxpayer's investments); Citizens & Sou......
-
Investment Research Associates, Ltd. v. Commissioner, Docket No. 43966-85.
...economic substance. See Hilton v. Commissioner [Dec. 36,962], 74 T.C. 305, 353 n. 23 (1980), affd. per curiam [82-1 USTC ¶ 9263] 671 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1982). The financing of transactions with deferred indebtedness that is unlikely to be paid is a strong indication of a lack of economic su......
-
Roe v. Commissioner
...Cir., Oct. 22, 1985). 52 See Hilton v. Commissioner Dec. 36,962, 74 T.C. 305, 361-363 (1980), affd. per curiam 82-1 USTC s 9263 671 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. 1982); see also Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Commissioner Dec. 40,410, 81 T.C. 184, 203-204 53 Although we have directed our discussion unde......
-
Can the battle be won? Compaq, the sham transaction doctrine, and a critique of proposals to combat the corporate tax shelter dragon.
...could realize a net tax savings of only $27,847 in exchange for a cash outlay of $51,594). (58) 74 T.C. 305 (1980), aff'd percuriam, 671 F.2d 316 (9th Cir. (59) Determining profit on a present value basis takes into account the time value of money. The general idea is that $1 received today......