Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company, 12987.

Decision Date03 April 1957
Docket NumberNo. 12987.,12987.
PartiesEva HINES, Appellant, v. ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Robert L. Myre of Garrison, Myre & Myre, Paducah, Ky., for appellant.

Ernest W. Rivers and Charles A. Williams, Paducah, Ky., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sought by her complaint to recover from the appellee, Royal Indemnity Company, payment of a judgment recovered by her against appellee's insured for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident caused by the negligent operation of the insured automobile. The District Judge sustained appellee's motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant's complaint for failure of the insured or the appellant to give notice to the appellee of the accident until approximately twenty-three months after the accident and for failure of the insured to cooperate with the insurer. The policy required written notice to be given to the insurer as soon as practicable after the accident.

For the reasons given by the District Judge in his opinion reported at D.C., 141 F.Supp. 234, and on the basis of the authorities cited therein, the judgment is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Hines v. Royal Indemnity Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • February 25, 1958
    ...Indemnity Co., D.C.W.D.Ky., 141 F.Supp. 234. The District Court judgment was affirmed by this Court on April 3, 1957. Hines v. Royal Indemnity Co., 6 Cir., 244 F.2d 959. Our mandate issued on April 24, 1957. A new term of court began on October 7, 1957. Rule 2(1), Rules of Court, 28 On Janu......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT