Hipsch's Will, In re

Decision Date30 December 1953
PartiesIn re HIPSCH'S WILL. HIPSCH, v. HIPSCH.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

Proceeding commenced by the petition of Marie Hipsch for construction of the will of Wenzel Hipsch, Jr., deceased husband of the petitioner. From the order of the county court construing said will, petitioner appeals.

The will in question was prepared by an attorney. It was executed by Wenzel Hipsch, Jr. on April 19, 1939. He died at the age of 48 years on April 11, 1952, survived by his widow, his mother, one brother and two sisters. He had no children. Over $30,000 worth of government bonds, which were held jointly by decedent and his wife, were cashed by Wenzel Hipsch, Jr. prior to his death, and no trace of the money has been found. At the time of his death he possessed only the homestead of the parties and $100 in a bank account.

Paragraphs Second and Third of the will provide:

'Second: I give, devise and bequeath to my wife, Marie Hipsch, such homestead and dower rights in all of the real estate of which I may die seized as she would have if I had died intestate.

'Third: I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my property, real and personal, of whatsoever nature and description and wheresoever situated, to my brother, August Hipsch, in trust for the following purposes, to-wit: * * *.'

Further provisions dealing with the trust are immaterial to the question presented.

Petitioner alleged that the will is ambiguous, particularly paragraph Second, and prayed for construction thereof. In the trial court's opinion the testator's intent was to give to his widow only such interest in his real estate as she could not be deprived of by will.

Howard A. Tilg, George W. Koch, Jr., Milwaukee, for appellant.

Alvin M. Strnad, Theodore R. Baer, Milwaukee, for respondent.

MARTIN, Justice.

It is stated in the trial court's opinion:

'It seems quite clear that testator intended to devise and bequeath to his wife only a part of his estate and the residue, upon termination of the trust, to go to his brother, two sisters and his wife. We cannot hold that he intended all of his property to go to his widow which would be the result under the statutes (237.02)(318.01) had he not lawfully devised or bequeathed the same.'

Section 237.02, Stats. provides:

'Homestead how to descend. When the owner of any homestead shall die not having lawfully devised the same, such homestead shall descend in the manner following:

'(1) If the decedent shall have no lawful issue, to the widow or widower.

'(2) If the decedent shall leave a widow and issue or a widower and issue, to the widow or widower so long as not remarried, and upon marriage or death to the original decedent's heirs according to section 237.01 * * *.'

It is unnecessary to discuss the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Klinkert's Will, In re
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1955
    ...that this case is governed by the decisions of this court in In re Estate of Gray, 265 Wis. 217, 61 N.W.2d 467 and In re Will of Hipsch, 265 Wis. 446, 62 N.W.2d 18. In the Gray case appeared the following provision for the widow [265 Wis. 217, 61 N.W.2d "I herewith give, devise, and bequeat......
  • Gibbs' Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1961
    ...26, 47-51.5 Ward v. Espy, 1846, 6 Humph. 447, 25 Tenn. 447.6 Estate of Grove, 1959, 6 Wis.2d 659, 95 N.W.2d 788; Will of Hipsch, 1953, 265 Wis. 446, 62 N.W.2d 18; Estate of Gray, 1953, 265 Wis. 217, 61 N.W.2d 467.7 1934, 214 Wis. 98, 251 N.W. 470, 92 A.L.R. 150.8 1915, 160 Wis. 577, 152 N.W......
  • Jankewicz' Estate, In re
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1966
    ...did, to construe the ambiguities in the will. Appellant cites Estate of Gray (1953), 265 Wis. 217, 61 N.W.2d 467, and Estate of Hipsch (1953), 265 Wis. 446, 62 N.W.2d 18, in support of her argument that the laws of intestacy apply. In Estate of Gray, supra, the will provided, 265 Wis. p. 21......
  • Ubbink v. Herbert A. Nieman & Co.
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1953

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT