Hitchcock v. Dugger, No. 85-6756

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSCALIA
Citation107 S.Ct. 1821,95 L.Ed.2d 347,481 U.S. 393
PartiesJames Ernest HITCHCOCK, Petitioner v. Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Docket NumberNo. 85-6756
Decision Date22 April 1987
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
549 practice notes
  • Williams v. Anderson, No. 3:99CV0570.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • November 19, 2001
    ...denied him due process by precluding the court from considering additional mitigating evidence, as mandated by Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, ......
  • Williams v. Chrans, No. 87 C 02084.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • July 5, 1990
    ...(1984). As to Williams' usefulness for scientific research, its exclusion was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Cf. Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 399, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 1669, 1673, 90 L.Ed.2d 1 I. Denial of W......
  • Nelson v. Sec'y, Case No: 2:11-cv-327-Ftm-29CM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • August 20, 2014
    ...of substance abuse, and found no merit in this claim. Petitioner argues that the Florida Supreme Court erred under Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 394 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 2 (1986), and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982). Specifically, he asserts that "the......
  • Osborn v. Shillinger, No. 86-2175
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • November 7, 1988
    ...is not permitted to draw such a line is the clearest principle in modern death penalty jurisprudence. See, e.g., Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) (unanimously holding that sentencer cannot be precluded from hearing or cannot refuse to consider a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
547 cases
  • Williams v. Anderson, No. 3:99CV0570.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Indiana
    • November 19, 2001
    ...denied him due process by precluding the court from considering additional mitigating evidence, as mandated by Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, ......
  • Williams v. Chrans, No. 87 C 02084.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • July 5, 1990
    ...(1984). As to Williams' usefulness for scientific research, its exclusion was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Cf. Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 399, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 1669, 1673, 90 L.Ed.2d 1 I. Denial of W......
  • Nelson v. Sec'y, Case No: 2:11-cv-327-Ftm-29CM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • August 20, 2014
    ...of substance abuse, and found no merit in this claim. Petitioner argues that the Florida Supreme Court erred under Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 394 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 2 (1986), and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982). Specifically, he asserts that "the......
  • Osborn v. Shillinger, No. 86-2175
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • November 7, 1988
    ...is not permitted to draw such a line is the clearest principle in modern death penalty jurisprudence. See, e.g., Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) (unanimously holding that sentencer cannot be precluded from hearing or cannot refuse to consider a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Institutionalizing the Culture of Control
    • United States
    • International Criminal Justice Review Nbr. 24-4, December 2014
    • December 1, 2014
    ...v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993)Hildwin v. Florida, 490 U.S. 638 (1989)Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006)Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393 (1987)Holland v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2549 (2010)Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)Hopkins v. Reeves, 524 U.S. 88 (1998)Hopper v. Evans, 45......
  • Proportionality and parole.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 160 Nbr. 6, May 2012
    • May 1, 2012
    ...to only three specified factors. See 438 U.S. at 607 (citing OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2929.04(B) (West 1975)). (105) Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 397 (106) Eddings, 455 U.S. at 115-16. (107) Hitchcock, 481 U.S. at 397. (108) Penryv. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 340 (1989). (109) McKoy v. North......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT