Hitchcock v. Dugger, No. 85-6756
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Writing for the Court | SCALIA |
Citation | 107 S.Ct. 1821,95 L.Ed.2d 347,481 U.S. 393 |
Parties | James Ernest HITCHCOCK, Petitioner v. Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Docket Number | No. 85-6756 |
Decision Date | 22 April 1987 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
549 practice notes
-
Williams v. Anderson, No. 3:99CV0570.
...denied him due process by precluding the court from considering additional mitigating evidence, as mandated by Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, ......
-
Williams v. Chrans, No. 87 C 02084.
...(1984). As to Williams' usefulness for scientific research, its exclusion was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Cf. Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 399, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 1669, 1673, 90 L.Ed.2d 1 I. Denial of W......
-
Nelson v. Sec'y, Case No: 2:11-cv-327-Ftm-29CM
...of substance abuse, and found no merit in this claim. Petitioner argues that the Florida Supreme Court erred under Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 394 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 2 (1986), and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982). Specifically, he asserts that "the......
-
Osborn v. Shillinger, No. 86-2175
...is not permitted to draw such a line is the clearest principle in modern death penalty jurisprudence. See, e.g., Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) (unanimously holding that sentencer cannot be precluded from hearing or cannot refuse to consider a......
Request a trial to view additional results
547 cases
-
Williams v. Anderson, No. 3:99CV0570.
...denied him due process by precluding the court from considering additional mitigating evidence, as mandated by Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987), Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 102 S.Ct. 869, 71 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982), and Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586, ......
-
Williams v. Chrans, No. 87 C 02084.
...(1984). As to Williams' usefulness for scientific research, its exclusion was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Cf. Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 399, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 106 S.Ct. 1669, 1673, 90 L.Ed.2d 1 I. Denial of W......
-
Nelson v. Sec'y, Case No: 2:11-cv-327-Ftm-29CM
...of substance abuse, and found no merit in this claim. Petitioner argues that the Florida Supreme Court erred under Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 394 (1987); Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U.S. 1, 2 (1986), and Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104 (1982). Specifically, he asserts that "the......
-
Osborn v. Shillinger, No. 86-2175
...is not permitted to draw such a line is the clearest principle in modern death penalty jurisprudence. See, e.g., Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 1824, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) (unanimously holding that sentencer cannot be precluded from hearing or cannot refuse to consider a......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Institutionalizing the Culture of Control
...v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993)Hildwin v. Florida, 490 U.S. 638 (1989)Hill v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 573 (2006)Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393 (1987)Holland v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2549 (2010)Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006)Hopkins v. Reeves, 524 U.S. 88 (1998)Hopper v. Evans, 45......
-
Proportionality and parole.
...to only three specified factors. See 438 U.S. at 607 (citing OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 2929.04(B) (West 1975)). (105) Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 397 (106) Eddings, 455 U.S. at 115-16. (107) Hitchcock, 481 U.S. at 397. (108) Penryv. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302, 340 (1989). (109) McKoy v. North......