Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., No. 1514.
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit) |
Writing for the Court | LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit |
Citation | 87 F.2d 380 |
Parties | HOBBS, Com'r of Insurance of State of Kansas, v. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Docket Number | No. 1514. |
Decision Date | 12 January 1937 |
87 F.2d 380 (1937)
HOBBS, Com'r of Insurance of State of Kansas,
v.
OCCIDENTAL LIFE INS. CO. et al.
No. 1514.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
January 12, 1937.
John G. Egan and John L. Hunt, both of Topeka, Kan. (Clarence V. Beck and John H. Hunt, both of Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.
George E. Brammer, of Des Moines, Iowa (Joseph Brody, Clyde B. Charlton, and Louis A. Parker, all of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for appellee Occidental Life Ins. Co.
Jerome S. Koehler, of Kansas City, Kan. (Thomas C. Lysaught, of Kansas City, Kan., on the brief), for appellee receiver.
Before LEWIS, PHILLIPS, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Reserve Life Insurance Company was organized under the laws of Kansas. One of its policyholders who was also a stockholder, acting for himself and all others similarly situated, instituted this action for the appointment of a liquidating receiver. An order was entered directing that the Commissioner of Insurance of the state be notified of the pendency of the suit and that he be permitted to intervene if he so desired. A copy of such order and a copy of the amended bill were served on the commissioner, but he failed to appear. The court found on May 22, 1936, that the affairs of the company had been wrongfully and dishonestly managed; that its assets were being dissipated; and that it was hopelessly insolvent. A temporary receiver was thereupon appointed and he was directed to seek proposals from solvent insurance companies to reinsure the outstanding policies of the failed company. Five days thereafter the company filed an answer in which it consented to the appointment of a permanent receiver and to the entry of a final decree directing reinsurance, rehabilitation, or liquidation of its affairs. Two days later the temporary receiver was appointed permanent receiver. The receiver and Occidental Life Insurance Company, a corporation organized under the laws of California and authorized to engage in business in Kansas, entered into a contract on June 13th, in which it was provided that, subject to
The court's approval, appended to the contract, was dated June 13th; and on the same date a decree was entered approving the agreement, directing the receiver to carry its provisions into execution and transferring all of the assets to Occidental, but with the provision that every holder of a policy who elected to reject the benefits of the agreement should within thirty days after Occidental mailed the notice of its assumption, deliver to the receiver his rejection in writing; that such an election should be considered as a claim for the cash surrender value of his policy as of May 22d, plus any amount thereafter paid on such insurance less the cost of carrying such insurance and less any amount paid by the receiver as a premium on any reinsurance treaty or contract covering such policy; that Occidental should be under no obligation or liability of any kind to any policyholder thus electing to reject benefits under the agreement; and that all policyholders who failed to reject such benefits in the manner and within the time specified should be deemed to have accepted such reinsurance contract and should be conclusively bound by its terms.
There were more than 27,000 policyholders on May 22d. Occidental sent each of them a copy of the agreement and the notice as directed. The receiver also mailed each of them a notice of the decree and called attention to the provision that all who failed to reject the benefits of the agreement should be deemed to have...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
International Co. v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., No. 11085.
...a part of the decree, appears in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit in Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 87 F.2d 380 q.v.98 F.2d 141 The court undertook by several provisions of its decree and reinsurance agreement2 to assure the court's full protection to the......
-
Comm'r of Ins. v. Massachusetts Acc. Co.
...754, 106 A.L.R. 1506;Lucas v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co., 137 Va. 255, 271, 272, 119 S.E. 109;Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 87 F.2d 380, 384; Couch on Insurance, s. 2043. See Williston on Contracts (Rev.ed.) ss. 1330, 1330A; Am.Law.Inst. Restatement Contracts, s. 332. It is t......
-
Security Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. FDIC, No. 91-4023-S.
...agreement" from "reinsurance agreement"), cited in Appleman § 7741, at 597 n. 2, 601 n. 12.05; see also Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 87 F.2d 380, 384-85 (10th Cir. Kan. 1937) (effect of reinsurance agreement was that policy holders acquired new insurance protection; novation was effec......
-
Commissioner of Ins. v. Massachusetts Acc. Co.
...Grotto M. O. V. P. E. R. Inc. 169 Tenn. 564. Lucas v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co. 137 Va. 255, 271, 272. Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. 87 F.2d 380, 384. Couch on Insurance, Section 2043. See Williston on Contracts (Rev. ed.) Sections 1330, 1330A; Am. Law Inst. Restatement: Contracts, Se......
-
International Co. v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., No. 11085.
...a part of the decree, appears in the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals of the Tenth Circuit in Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 87 F.2d 380 q.v.98 F.2d 141 The court undertook by several provisions of its decree and reinsurance agreement2 to assure the court's full protection to the......
-
Comm'r of Ins. v. Massachusetts Acc. Co.
...754, 106 A.L.R. 1506;Lucas v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co., 137 Va. 255, 271, 272, 119 S.E. 109;Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 10 Cir., 87 F.2d 380, 384; Couch on Insurance, s. 2043. See Williston on Contracts (Rev.ed.) ss. 1330, 1330A; Am.Law.Inst. Restatement Contracts, s. 332. It is t......
-
Security Ben. Life Ins. Co. v. FDIC, No. 91-4023-S.
...agreement" from "reinsurance agreement"), cited in Appleman § 7741, at 597 n. 2, 601 n. 12.05; see also Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co., 87 F.2d 380, 384-85 (10th Cir. Kan. 1937) (effect of reinsurance agreement was that policy holders acquired new insurance protection; novation was effec......
-
Commissioner of Ins. v. Massachusetts Acc. Co.
...Grotto M. O. V. P. E. R. Inc. 169 Tenn. 564. Lucas v. Pittsburgh Life & Trust Co. 137 Va. 255, 271, 272. Hobbs v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. 87 F.2d 380, 384. Couch on Insurance, Section 2043. See Williston on Contracts (Rev. ed.) Sections 1330, 1330A; Am. Law Inst. Restatement: Contracts, Se......