Hochman v. State, 1 Div. 700
| Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
| Writing for the Court | SPANN; LIVINGSTON |
| Citation | 91 So.2d 502,265 Ala. 404 |
| Parties | M. HOCHMAN v. STATE. |
| Decision Date | 21 December 1956 |
| Docket Number | 1 Div. 700 |
Page 502
v.
STATE.
Page 503
Chas. Hoffman, Mobile, for petitioner.
John Patterson, Atty. Gen., opposed.
SPANN, Justice.
This is a petition by M. Hochman for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the decision of that court in the case of Hochman v. State, 91 So.2d 495.
We have no alternative but to strike the petition because not presented on transcript paper as required by Revised Supreme Court Rule 32, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix. Duckett v. State, 257 Ala. 589, 60 So.2d 357; Stovall v. State, 257 Ala. 116, 57 So.2d 641; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., 256 Ala. 466, 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Patillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30; Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409; Williams v. State, 258 Ala. 638, 64 So.2d 617.
Petition stricken.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Smith v. State
...an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction."` Hochman [v. State], 265 Ala. [1] at 3[, 91 So.2d 500 (1956), cert. stricken, 265 Ala. 404, 91 So.2d 502 (Ala.1956)]. Boyd v. State, 3 Ala.App. 178, 181, 57 So. 1019 (1912)." Copeland v. State, 456 So.2d 1150, 1151 Smith was charged......
-
Vaughn v. State
...So.2d 500, 501 (1956). "`[I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction.'" Hochman, 265 Ala. at 3, 91 So.2d at 502, quoting McLain v. State, 15 Ala.App. 24, 72 So. 511, 512 (1916). "`The government need only allege the "essential facts necessary to appris......
-
Graham v. State, CR–14–1652.
...500, 501 (Ala.1956). ‘ "[I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction." ’ Hochman, 265 Ala. 1 at 3, 91 So.2d at 502, quoting McLain v. State, 15 Ala.App. 24, 72 So. 511, 512 (1916). ‘ "The government need only allege the ‘essential facts necessary to app......
-
Harris v. State
...are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts." Hochman v. State, 265 Ala. 1, 3, 91 So.2d 500, 501 (Ala.), cert. stricken, 265 Ala. 404, 91 So.2d 502 (Ala.1956). "We are unable to see how the offense could have been more specifically described without pleading evidentiary facts......
-
Smith v. State
...an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction."` Hochman [v. State], 265 Ala. [1] at 3[, 91 So.2d 500 (1956), cert. stricken, 265 Ala. 404, 91 So.2d 502 (Ala.1956)]. Boyd v. State, 3 Ala.App. 178, 181, 57 So. 1019 (1912)." Copeland v. State, 456 So.2d 1150, 1151 Smith was charged......
-
Vaughn v. State
...So.2d 500, 501 (1956). "`[I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction.'" Hochman, 265 Ala. at 3, 91 So.2d at 502, quoting McLain v. State, 15 Ala.App. 24, 72 So. 511, 512 (1916). "`The government need only allege the "essential facts necessary to appris......
-
Graham v. State, CR–14–1652.
...500, 501 (Ala.1956). ‘ "[I]t is not required that an indictment set up the proof necessary to a conviction." ’ Hochman, 265 Ala. 1 at 3, 91 So.2d at 502, quoting McLain v. State, 15 Ala.App. 24, 72 So. 511, 512 (1916). ‘ "The government need only allege the ‘essential facts necessary to app......
-
Harris v. State
...are rather a statement of legal conclusions, than of facts." Hochman v. State, 265 Ala. 1, 3, 91 So.2d 500, 501 (Ala.), cert. stricken, 265 Ala. 404, 91 So.2d 502 (Ala.1956). "We are unable to see how the offense could have been more specifically described without pleading evidentiary facts......