Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp., 41227-2-1

Decision Date28 April 1999
Docket NumberNo. 41227-2-1,41227-2-1
Citation975 P.2d 563
CourtWashington Court of Appeals
PartiesDanelle HODDEVIK, Respondent, v. ARCTIC ALASKA FISHERIES CORPORATION, et al., Appellant.
ORDER CHANGING OPINION

The panel having determined that the opinion should be changed, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion of this court in the above-entitled case filed February 1, 1999 , be changed as follows:

On page seven of the opinion, the second full paragraph [second column, first full paragraph of page 832 of 970 P.2d], last sentence reading as:

But we need not determine as a matter of law whether the jury verdict on these unseaworthiness instructions disposes of Hoddevik's Jones Act claim because we are persuaded by Arctic's alternative argument that a reversal is required.

shall be changed to read as follows:

However, we do not conclude that a jury could not so decide.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain the same.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLC
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 24, 2009
    ...102 Wash.App. 848, 853, 10 P.3d 1079 (2000) (citing Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp., 94 Wash.App. 268, 278, 970 P.2d 828, 975 P.2d 563 (1999)). "The party opposing arbitration bears the burden of showing that the agreement is not enforceable." Zuver v. Airtouch Commc'ns, Inc., 153......
  • Robertson v. State Liquor Control Bd.
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • October 12, 2000
    ...and RCW 8.24.250. Preemption is reviewed de novo. Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries, Corp., 94 Wash.App. 268, 278, 970 P.2d 828, 975 P.2d 563, review denied, 138 Wash.2d 1016, 989 P.2d 1140 (1999), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 1161, 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 We begin by assuming state law......
  • Winkler v. Coastal Towing, L.L.C.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • April 11, 2002
    ...984 F.2d at 1280. In Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp., 94 Wash.App. 268, 970 P.2d 828 (Div. 1, 1999), amended by, 975 P.2d 563 (Wash.App. Div. 1, 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1155, 120 S.Ct. 1161, 145 L.Ed.2d 1072 (2000), a Jones Act seaman sued for sexual discrimination under Was......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT