Hodgins v. Harris
Decision Date | 30 November 1895 |
Citation | 4 Idaho 517,43 P. 72 |
Parties | HODGINS, ADMINISTRATOR, v. HARRIS |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
FINAL JUDGMENT-ORDER FOR IS NOT.-An order for a judgment is not such a final judgment as an appeal can be taken from under the provisions of the statutes of Idaho.
(Syllabus by the court.)
APPEAL from District Court, Latah County.
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Forney, Smith & Moore and R. T. Morgan, for Appellant.
S. S. Denning, for Harris and Wife, Respondents.
Eugene O'Neill and J. C. Elder, for Intervener White.
No briefs were filed or authorities cited by any of the attorneys upon the point decided by the court.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. At the end of the conclusions of law found by the district court, the following words appear: This is not a judgment, as has been repeatedly decided by this court, following uniform decisions of the supreme court of California upon identical statutes. (Durant v. Comegys, 3 Idaho 67, 35 Am. St. Rep. 267, 26 P. 755; Gray v. Cederholm, 2 Idaho 34, 3 P. 12; Meysan v. Chabrie (Cal.), 2 Cal. Unrep. 508, 7 P. 634; Stebbins v. Savage, 5 Mont. 253, 5 P. 278; Gray v. Palmer, 28 Cal. 416; McNevin v. McNevin, 11 P. C. L. J. 92; Thomas v. Anderson, 55 Cal. 43; Schroder v. Schmidt, 71 Cal. 399, 12 P. 302; and many others.) Appeal dismissed with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial