Hoffman v. Apgar

Decision Date05 January 1934
Docket NumberNo. 78.,78.
Citation169 A. 690
PartiesC. Stewart HOFFMAN et al., Ex'rs, etc., Appellants v. Joseph APGAR et al., Respondents.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Appeal from Prerogative Court.

McCarter & English, of Newark, for appellant.

Ryman Herr, of Somerville, and Peer & Mahr, of Newark, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice Chancellor Buchanan, reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 233, 166 A. 159.

For affirmance: The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, and PERSKIE, and Judges VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, and DILL—15.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Francisco v. Citizens Trust Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Court of Chancery
    • 11 Diciembre 1942
    ...who would take under the statute of distribution. Apgar v. Hoffman, 113 N.J. Eq. 233, 166 A. 159, affirmed sub nom. Hoffman v. Apgar, 115 N.J.Eq. 171, 169 A. 690; Trenton Trust Co. v. Gane, 125 N.J.Eq. 389, 6 A.2d 112, affirmed 126 N.J. Eq. 273, 8 A.2d 708. It has been urged that the phrase......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT