Holden v. Arnebergh
| Decision Date | 03 March 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 945,945 |
| Citation | 89 S.Ct. 926,22 L.Ed.2d 112,394 U.S. 102 |
| Parties | Eugene HOLDEN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Meyer v. Austin
...declaratory relief in Holden v. Arnebergh, 265 Cal.App.2d 87, 71 Cal.Rptr. 401 (Cal., 1968), appeal dismissed, 394 U.S. 102, 89 S.Ct. 926, 22 L.Ed.2d 112 (1969). Whatever delay has been caused in the present case has not been attributable to plaintiffs, who acted promptly and repeatedly urg......
- Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates
- United States v. Hosmer, Crim. No. 70-21.
- United States v. Johnson, 30656.
Request a trial to view additional results