Holden v. State
Citation | 90 So.3d 902 |
Decision Date | 14 June 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 1D11–1828.,1D11–1828. |
Parties | Dannie Stanford HOLDEN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Dannie Stanford Holden, Jr., pro se, Appellant.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glenna Joyce Reeves and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this Anders1 appeal, Appellant entered a plea of nolo contendere to the lesser included charge of attempted sexual battery and resisting an officer without violence. Appellant sought to preserve for appeal the review of the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress his confession and the trial court's determination on the admissibility of the child victim's out-of-court statements to a Child Protective Team (“CPT”) forensic interviewer and the doctor who performed the forensic medical evaluation.
Having pled nolo contendere, Appellant is limited as to the issues that he can raise on direct appeal. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). A defendant who pleads nolo contendere may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). A trial court is obligated to determine the dispositive nature of an issue reserved for appeal. See Everett v. State, 535 So.2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Here, the State did not stipulate, and the trial judge erroneously declined to determine that these issues are dispositive, deferring the determination to this court.
We have reviewed the entire record before us and conclude that the two issues reserved for appeal are not dispositive. As to the first issue, Appellant's confession, we note that a defendant who has pled no contest may not preserve as an issue the trial court's failure to suppress a confession, absent a stipulation by the State that the issue is dispositive of the case. Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382, 385 (Fla.1979); Leisure v. State, 429 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Here the State at sentencing commented that it did not care if Appellant appealed, concurring with the trial court's statement that it was not sure that the issue was dispositive and noting that Appellant could “reserve his rights to appeal whatever matters the law allows him to appeal.” We do not consider this a stipulation. Because the State did not stipulate that Appellant's confession was dispositive, we need not reach the merits of this issue.
As to the second issue, the admissibility of child hearsay statements, we find that the record on appeal contains overwhelming evidence that the State could have proceeded to trial, regardless of whether Appellant successfully argued on appeal that the child hearsay statements were inadmissible. See Williams v. State, ––– So.3d ––––, 2012 WL 1109129 (Fla. 1st DCA April 4, 2012) () Here, there was testimony from the child victim and an eyewitness who walked in and saw Appellant and the child victim engaged in sexual conduct. Accordingly,we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence.
AFFIRMED.
It is important that the defendant understand what the consequences of his or her plea are, including what can and cannot be reviewed on direct appeal, at the time the plea is entered. As we recently explained in Williams v. State, ––– So.3d ––––, 2012 WL 1109129 (Fla. 1st DCA Apr. 4, 2012), following supreme court precedent on the point, see Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382, 384 (Fla.1979) and State v. Ashby, 245 So.2d 225, 228 (Fla.1971):
A defendant who pleads no contest may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive order of the lower tribunal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i). An issue is dispositive only when it is clear that there will be no trial, regardless of the outcome of the appeal. Fuller v. State, 748 So.2d 292, 294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Williams, ––– So.3d at ––––.See also Morgan v. State, 486 So.2d 1356, 1357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (). Whether a ruling is dispositive is a question for the trial court, and not for us, in the first instance, because it is imperative that the defendant's plea be voluntary and intelligent.
Here, as in Williams, “the record is not inconsistent with the view that appellant's plea was induced by assurances that [certain] issues would be addressed on direct appeal.” ––– So.3d at ––––. (Benton, C.J., concurring). Here, as in Williams, however, no relief is available on the present appeal from a conviction predicated on a plea that was not intelligent, in the absence of a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court. See Leonard v. State, 760 So.2d 114, 119 (Fla.2000) (). Possibly without counsel, appellant is left to avail himself of Williams, ––– So.3d at –––– (Benton, C.J., concurring).
In this case, Appellant entered a plea of no contest and sought to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Milliron v. State
...18 (Fla. 2017), a "trial court is obligated to determine the dispositive nature of an issue reserved for appeal." Holden v. State , 90 So. 3d 902, 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). Absent such a determination, appellate courts are left to determine the question themselves and potentially affirm a ju......
-
Ramsey v. State
...of copper is not subject to appellate review because his motion to dismiss was not dispositive as to that charge.3See Holden v. State, 90 So.3d 902, 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (denying appellate review of conviction where defendant pled nolo contendere to attempted sexual battery, but where st......
-
Murphy v. State, 1D13–5652.
...motion to suppress bring into question the “voluntary and intelligent” nature of Appellant's plea. See Holden v. State, 90 So.3d 902, 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (Benton, C.J., concurring).At this point in time, it is too late for Mr. Murphy to file a motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to rul......
-
Alvarado v. State
...Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.PER CURIAM.AFFIRMED. See Holden v. State, 90 So.3d 902, 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) ("[W]e note that a defendant who has pled no contest may not preserve as an issue the trial court's failure to suppr......
-
Defendant's statements
...to suppress a confession by pleading no contest. The denial of a motion to suppress a confession is not dispositive. Holden v. State, 90 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) Admitting evidence of an offer to plead guilty is inadmissible under §90.410. Where the prosecutor asks the defendant on cr......
-
Evidence
...statements, the decision to admit the statements is not dispositive and cannot be preserved by a no contest plea. Holden v. State, 90 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) In deciding whether a statement against penal interest should be believed, the jury must make that decision, not the trial cou......
-
Charging a crime, arraignment and pleas
...statements, the decision to admit the statements is not dispositive and cannot be preserved by a no contest plea. Holden v. State, 90 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) A motion to withdraw plea filed under rule 3.170(l) must be filed within 30 days of the rendition of sentence. The 30-day peri......
-
Appeals
...statements, the decision to admit the statements is not dispositive and cannot be preserved by a no contest plea. Holden v. State, 90 So. 3d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) APPEALS 8.2 The Florida Criminal Cases Notebook 8-14 A claim that discretionary costs were improperly imposed without announci......