Holderman v. Hood
| Decision Date | 10 October 1903 |
| Docket Number | 13,064 |
| Citation | 67 Kan. 851,73 P. 1132 |
| Parties | ELIZABETH HOLDERMAN v. CALVIN HOOD et al |
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Decided July, 1903.
Error from Lyon district court; DENNIS MADDEN, judge.
Judgment affirmed.
A. L. Redden, for plaintiff in error.
Kellogg & Madden, and Gleed, Ware & Gleed, for defendants in error.
CUNNINGHAM, J., not sitting, having been of counsel.
One of the justices being disqualified to hear this cause, and the six others being divided in opinion, the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.
CUNNINGHAM, J., not sitting, having been of counsel.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thornton v. Shore, 54477
...Ward v. Davis, 177 Kan. 629, 281 P.2d 1084 (1955); State, ex rel. v. Holsman, 175 Kan. 476, 264 P.2d 919 (1953); Holderman v. Hood, 67 Kan. 851, 73 P. 1132 (1903); 5 Am.Jur.2d, Appeal & Error § 902, pp. 338-9; 5B C.J.S., Appeal & Error § 1844b, p. 252. See also Kansas Constitution, Art. 3, ......
-
Blasi v. Miller, 40613
...(See, e. g., Ward v. Davis, 177 Kan. 629, 281 P.2d 1084; State ex rel. Wilson v. Holsman, 175 Kan. 476, 264 P.2d 919; Holderman v. Hood, 67 Kan. 851, 73 P. 1132) is that where one of the Justices is legally disqualified to participate in a decision of the issues raised on an appeal and the ......
-
Scott v. Harber
...appeal and the remaining six justices are equally divided in their conclusions the judgment of the trial court must stand. Holderman v. Hood, 67 Kan. 851, 73 P. 1132; State ex rel. Wilson v. Holsman, 175 Kan. 476, 264 P.2d 919; Ward v. Davis, 177 Kan. 629, 281 P.2d 1084; Blasi v. Miller, 18......
- Coppedge v. The M. K. Goetz Brewing Company