Holifield v. Reno, No. 95-3280

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
Writing for the CourtBefore BLACK; PER CURIAM
Citation115 F.3d 1555
Parties74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 511, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 91 Edward A. HOLIFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States, Joseph Class, Warden of FCI Marianna, Garland Jeffers, Associate Warden, FCI Marianna, Defendants-Appellees.
Decision Date02 July 1997
Docket NumberNo. 95-3280
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1617 practice notes
  • Johnston v. Henderson, No. 00-6445CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • May 1, 2001
    ...burden shifts to the employer to proffer a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1566 (11th Cir. 1997). The burden on the defendant is one of production only, and not persuasion. Once the defendant has presented this evide......
  • Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc., Civil Action File No. 1:08-CV-3639-BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • August 18, 2009
    ...of producing a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its employment action. This burden is "exceedingly light." Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1564 (11th Cir.1997). "The defendant must merely proffer nondiscriminatory based reasons, not prove them." Meeks v. Computer Assocs. Int'l., ......
  • Morgan v. Cnty. Comm'n of Lawrence Cnty., Civil Action No. 5:14-CV-01823-CLS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • June 20, 2016
    ...he presents circumstantial evidence that creates a triable issue concerning the employer's discriminatory intent. See Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1562 (11th Cir. 1997) (declaring that, in cases where a plaintiff cannot establish a prima facie case, summary judgment only will be "appro......
  • Brackin v. Int'l Paper, Civil Action No. CV-10-03444-CLS
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Alabama
    • October 9, 2012
    ...Thus, it should also be resolved by the trier of facts, not by a motion to strike. Even though defendant cites Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555 (11th Cir. 1997), for the proposition that "[t]he biases of one who neither makes nor influences the challenged personnel decision are not probativ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1616 cases
  • Johnston v. Henderson, No. 00-6445CIV.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Southern District of Florida
    • May 1, 2001
    ...burden shifts to the employer to proffer a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1566 (11th Cir. 1997). The burden on the defendant is one of production only, and not persuasion. Once the defendant has presented this evide......
  • Campbell v. Thomas, CASE NO. 2:10-CV-694-WC [WO]
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Middle District of Alabama
    • September 25, 2013
    ...to create a genuine issue of material fact and, therefore, do not suffice to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1564 n.6 (11th Cir. 1997) (A plaintiff's "conclusory assertions . . . , in the absence of [admissible] supporting evidence, are insufficient t......
  • Anderson v. Dunbar Armored, Inc., Civil Action File No. 1:08-CV-3639-BBM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • August 18, 2009
    ...of producing a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for its employment action. This burden is "exceedingly light." Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1564 (11th Cir.1997). "The defendant must merely proffer nondiscriminatory based reasons, not prove them." Meeks v. Computer Assocs. Int'l., ......
  • Wright v. Southland Corp., No. 97-3458
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • September 3, 1999
    ...intent harbored by Bishop is therefore irrelevant to the question of Southland's liability under the ADEA. See Holifield v. Reno, 115 F.3d 1555, 1563-64 (11th Cir.1997) (" 'The biases of one who neither makes nor influences the challenged personnel decision are not probative in an employmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT