Holliday v. National Dairy Products Corp.
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
| Citation | Holliday v. National Dairy Products Corp., 216 N.W.2d 919, 391 Mich. 816 (Mich. 1974) |
| Decision Date | 24 April 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 55551,55551 |
| Parties | Oliver Leroy HOLLIDAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL DAIRY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. 391 Mich. 816, 216 N.W.2d 919 |
Before the Entire Bench.
ORDER
On order of the Court, plaintiff and appellant's application for leave to appeal is hereby granted. Pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), the Court on its own motion, for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of Judge Bronson reported at 50 Mich.App. 366, 370, 213 N.W.2d 289 (1973) hereby orders that the decision of the trial court denying defendant's motion for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict is hereby affirmed.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Craig v. Larson
...152; 1961 P.A. 224; 1972 P.A. 196; 1980 P.A. 351.6 See also Todd v. Biglow, 51 Mich. App. 346, 351, 214 N.W.2d 733 (1974), lv. den. 391 Mich. 816 (1974).7 Arciero v. Wicks, 150 Mich.App. 522, 389 N.W.2d 116 (1986); Plamondon v. Matthews, 148 Mich.App. 737, 385 N.W.2d 273 (1985); Goss v. Ric......
-
O'Donnell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
...of the claim as determined from the pleadings alone. Todd v. Biglow, 51 Mich.App. 346, 349, 214 N.W.2d 733 (1974), Lv. den. 391 Mich. 816 (1974); 1 Honigman & Hawkins (2d ed.), Committee Notes to GCR 1963, 117, pp. 353, 355. For the purposes of that motion, both at the trial and appellate l......
-
Stewart v. Troutt
...of the claim as determined from the pleadings alone. Todd v. Biglow, 51 Mich.App. 346, 349, 214 N.W.2d 733 (1974), lv. den., 391 Mich. 816 (1974), 1 Honigman & Hawkins supra ; Committee Notes to GCR 1963, 117, pp. 353-355. For the purposes of that motion, both at the trial and appellate lev......
-
Pelc v. Bendix Mach. Tool Corp.
...plaintiff was surprised, misled or prejudiced by this omission. Todd v. Biglow, 51 Mich.App. 346, 214 N.W.2d 733 (1974), lv. den., 391 Mich. 816 (1974). Finally, since plaintiff failed to cite any authority in support of its argument that a grant of summary judgment is improper in an area o......
Get Started for Free