Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Hollinger v. Hollinger

Document Cited authorities 22 Cited in 4 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date20 March 2020
Docket NumberCase No. 5D19-2163
Citation292 So.3d 537
Parties John D. HOLLINGER, Individually and as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John L. Hollinger as Trustee, Appellant, v. Michael R. HOLLINGER, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Rex Engineering Corporation, Rhonda L. Hinds, and Rhonda L. Hinds & Associates CPA, PA, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Cabrera v. Google LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 4, 2021
    ...from the other party to the APA who stated that TO's causes of action were not part of the sale of TO. See Hollinger v. Hollinger, 292 So. 3d 537, 542 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020) (noting extrinsic evidence is relevant to interpreting latent ambiguity in contract). Finding the affidavit was b......
  • Spring Isle Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Herme Enters., Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 2021
    ...summary judgment has the burden to prove conclusively the nonexistence of any genuine issue of material fact. Hollinger v. Hollinger , 292 So. 3d 537, 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). If a genuine issue of material fact exists, summary judgment is inappropriate. Id. Here, Herme had the burden to sh......
  • Spring Isle Cmty. Ass'n v. Herme Enters.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 2021
    ...Hollinger v. Hollinger, 292 So.3d 537, 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020). If a genuine issue of material fact exists, summary judgment is inappropriate. Id. Here, Herme had the burden show conclusively that there was no genuine issue of fact regarding the commencement date of the statute of repose. I......
  • Berengo v. Daley Law Firm PLLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 30, 2022
    ...The order does not divest Appellants, or any other shareholders, of immediate possession of their shares. See Hollinger v. Hollinger, 292 So. 3d 537, 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (reviewing order that divested appellants of possession of two shares that had been transferred in contravention of a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT