Hollis v. Burgess
| Decision Date | 05 November 1887 |
| Citation | Hollis v. Burgess, 37 Kan. 487, 15 P. 536 (Kan. 1887) |
| Parties | SOLOMON M. HOLLIS, et al., v. ISAAC W. BURGESS |
| Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Error from Norton District Court.
ACTION for specific performance of contract to convey real estate. Trial by the court, at the October Term, 1885. The court made findings of fact and conclusions of law as follows:
" "Afterward, and on the same day, Hollis sent Marsh a letter as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Ray v. Wooster
...name has been held in many cases to be sufficient. Michelson v. Sherman, 310 Mass. 774, 39 N.E.2d 633, 139 A.L.R. 960; Hollis v. Burgess, 37 Kan. 487, 15 P. 536; Jones v. Hickson, 204 Miss. 373, 37 So.2d 625; Raines v. Baird, 84 Miss. 807, 37 So. 458; Henry v. Black, 210 Pa. 245, 59 A. 1070......
-
Seifert v. Lanz
...5, 11 Jur. N. S. 1022, 13 L. T. N. S. 293, 14 Week. Rep. 86; Lee v. Cherry, 85 Tenn. 707, 4 Am. St. Rep. 800, 4 S.W. 835; Hollis v. Burgess, 37 Kan. 487, 15 P. 536. statute of frauds is only concerned with evidence by which an agreement can be established, and it matters not to whom the let......
-
Allen v. Kitchen
...description be somewhat general." (Lente v. Clarke, 22 Fla. 515, 1 So. 149; Eggleston v. Wagner, 46 Mich. 610, 10 N.W. 37; Hollis v. Burgess, 37 Kan. 487, 15 P. 536; v. Combe, 1 Pet. 640, 7 L.Ed. 295; Nichols v. Johnson, 10 Conn. 192; Mead v. Parker, 115 Mass. 413, 15 Am. Rep. 110; Bulkley ......
-
Warner v. Marshall
... ... (1903), 161 Ind. 533, 63 L. R. A. 593, 100 Am. St. 287, 69 ... N.E. 291; Swett v. Shumway (1869), 102 ... Mass. 365, 3 Am. Rep. 471; Hollis v ... Burgess (1887), 37 Kan. 487, 494, 15 P. 536; ... Burgon v. Cabanne (1890), 42 Minn. 267, 44 ... N.W. 118; Case v. Phoenix Bridge ... ...
Get Started for Free